its just word semantics to make crime less offensive and more forgivable. i didnt steal that car, i was receiving stolen property. i didnt steal your entire IP, i just infringed on your copyright. Lanx is right, people need to stop making excuses and just admit, yes i wanted to do this, so i took it.By definition it isn't theft, it's copyright infringement. Stealing food from a grocery store is taking a physical property from the owners. Piracy does nothing of the sort. You can argue the ethical aspects of it until the cows come home, but it isn't theft.
its just word semantics to make crime less offensive and more forgivable. i didnt steal that car, i was receiving stolen property. i didnt steal your entire IP, i just infringed on your copyright. Lanx is right, people need to stop making excuses and just admit, yes i wanted to do this, so i took it.
Rapefugee your way through living in eastern EU, like all the others. They'll pay you for it. Serious $$. All the white women you can eat. Take their money after the raping, buy games.
I mean...that's how they do it right now after all.
This is a weird thread.
He's Romanian which means he's white. In other words: He has the wrong skin colour for this to be considered acceptable.
i'm not judging, i dont think Lanx is either. just call a spade a spade.It's not semantics. And your car analogy doesn't work as the car would have to be 3d printed or something before receiving it. It also isn't about excusing anything. It's about correcting incorrect usage of words that don't apply, which carry specific connotations with them.
Intentionally ignoring the meaning of words to push an opinion is a source of ignorance and misinformation.
That people such as yourself and Lanx get so caught up on the need for it to contain the weight and value of "theft" for it to be a negative thing is your own hangup. Don't expect others to follow behind your error in order to make yourself feel better about it.
i'm not judging, i dont think Lanx is either. just call a spade a spade.
whatever, i dont care, infringe all the copyright you want. i do it for movies whenever i feel like it. but i dont sugar coat what i'm doing.No, what you're doing is calling a spade a shovel, and using the weight of the word 'shovel' to impact your message.
To put it in terms that you might appreciate a little more: It's the exact same mentality that modern liberals are using to influence peoples emotions through lying in order to advance their goals. Flirting on a woman that doesn't want you to? That's really rape. You voice criticism of people who are a different colour? That's racism and you're a Nazi. Why do they do these things? Because words carry weight to them that are not intrinsic to their actual definition and they know that it makes people pay attention more.
Copyright infringement is wrong. Theft is wrong. You don't need to confuse the two in order for the act to be wrong or voice your dislike of it.
Most people don't need or want to separate the two, but to me the act of physically taking something from someone else holds more weight than copying something they do. By confusing the two you actually devalue the importance of theft.
i think you do it for the tv showswhatever, i dont care, infringe all the copyright you want. i do it for movies whenever i feel like it. but i dont sugar coat what i'm doing.