Running Dog_sl
shitlord
- 1,199
- 3
I think at the last count there's between 100 and 200 years worth of Uranium left to extract before it gets really difficult to do so. Thorium should be an alternative, but these days who wants to be the guinea pig for a new type of commercial (not research) fission reactor?This is technically true, but.....who cares? Ok, maybe we have 30,000 years worth of fusion fuel and only 3,000 years of fission fuel, but that's pretty much the epitome of irrelevant.
With regards to the Lockheed release, it's possible they have made a breakthrough but I'd be sceptical about how significant it is. ITER is burning trough money but they are making progress slowly. One of the major issues is that whatever you make a fusion reactor out of, it has to withstand intense neutron bombardment, and the only way to find out how well it does so is to make one. If you have to keep rebuilding your reactor every few years then fusion might not be viable, so knowing what kind of materials work best is crucial.