People still get confused on Innocent VS Not Guilty. It does not matter at all what evidence wasn't shown. The documentary has nothing to do with his innocent or guilt. The documentary is about some poor hillbilly retard getting railroaded by the criminal justice system, fucking twice. From what was shown in the documentary the only reasonable verdict was Not Guilty, extreme reasonable doubt due to prosecutorial and police misconduct.
Tomorrow a fucking hidden camera video recording of Steven Avery dragging the chick out to her car, throwing her in the back of it (so her blood gets in there), taking her out to the woods, shooting her in the back of the head and leaving her dead body and car there could magically turn up, undeniably proving his guilt, and the result is the same. His conviction is still a miscarriage of Justice and should be vacated, He was still Not Guilty of the crime they framed him for and he should be granted a retrial. (Obviously it would be a swift verdict the 2nd time around if there was a video, and everyone involved in the first trial should still go to prison for the frame job the first time around)
What the documentary's "Bias" is asking the following, to the judge, prosecution, and viewers at home:
How the fuck did you allow the Sheriff's dept to participate in the investigation? They have a clear conflict of interest and coincidentally they "found" all the evidence?
How the fuck did they find a magic bullet sitting on the floor of his garage in plain view, despite days of searching after all the clean, unaffiliated police found nothing?
How did you allow the prosecution to present the completely invalid DNA evidence that it had her DNA on it?
See magic bullet above but apply to the car key that magically appeared in plain view in his trailer?
(Not shown in the documentary but was shown in the trial) How did you allow the prosecution to present completely invalid DNA evidence that Avery's sweat was on the hood latch of her car?
How did you allow the FBI analyst to testify that it was there job to get the police off the hook, and falsify his testimony about the reliability of his test he just invented specifically to get the police off?
How do you allow the police to fucking Hoyer the burn area and randomly shovel shit ruining the crime scene where the bones were found?
How do you let the prosecutor poison the well with a complete bullshit coerced "confession" from a retard?
The only forensic evidence that should of even been allowed to be presented is the Steven Avery blood in the car, of which the police must answer how the fuck did someone break in to the evidence locker, tamper with the blood vials they had on hand, and stick a syringe in his vials of blood?
Hell even the car itself and it being on his property should of been thrown out, since it's clear that detective Colbourn (defendant in the $36mil civil lawsuit) found the car 2 days before it was "found".
The only forensic evidence that should be allowed: Her car had her blood in it. It had some of Steven's blood in it under very suspicious circumstances. With the conflict of interest there's not even enough to press charges against him or take him into custody. Now get the fuck out of the way and allow a real police department to do a real investigation and actually find a murderer.
