Awful
I never played Tarkov, was it really like $250 to get into it? I just don't know anything about the game other than it being some sort of survival looter shooter or something.Early rumors were $40 and I think if it was going to be free they would have said so today. Bungie is probably looking at Tarkov's $250 buy in and justifying it to themselves. Will definitely make the launch harder than it should be for them.
If a flat price means the only transactions in-game are cosmetics, I would be okay with that. I'm extremely tired of freemium battle pass models in every other game.
I never played Tarkov, was it really like $250 to get into it?
What's the 250 pack get a player vs the base game? Sorry just curious, I'm never going to buy it I'm just trying to understand that sort of weird bottleneck to enjoy a game to its fullest. Is that that you get a lot more maps or weapons or something?It's $50 to get in but I think any serious player would argue you need the $250 pack.
What's the 250 pack get a player vs the base game? Sorry just curious, I'm never going to buy it I'm just trying to understand that sort of weird bottleneck to enjoy a game to its fullest. Is that that you get a lot more maps or weapons or something?
Awful
Why can’t veteran devs make good games anymore? Trying real hard to think of an established studio that keeps on making good games. Owlcat and Larian not withstanding and owlcat makes good games 4 years after it releases.
What can be done in the modern climate to course correct? Besides day drinking.Because most of the games we play are on five year dev cycles. Four games. 20 years. Average good dev lasts 6. Best case a few go to leadership 15 years. Skyrim was 14 years ago. But seems like yesterday. All these folks are gone. Long gone. And if you think this is bad, just wait another 10. We will regress into the fucking Stone Age unless something is done.![]()