pharmakos
soʞɐɯɹɐɥd
- 16,305
- -2,233
i've been hesitant to start a poll thread since all Utnayan discussion has been merged here. i take it this is your way of saying a poll might be appropriate?
- 1
Misunderstood pro football player donates an Xbox to a cancer ward
- Thread starter Utnayan
- Start date
- Status
i've been hesitant to start a poll thread since all Utnayan discussion has been merged here. i take it this is your way of saying a poll might be appropriate?
There is a difference between a viable thread and random posts in other threads.
pharmakos
soʞɐɯɹɐɥd
- 16,305
- -2,233
eh, i mean, most of them were in the "Bannings" thread
anyway, Araysar made it sound like you were in on the decision that the ban would be irreversible. it's still your show at the end of the day, just making sure democracy still rules here even past just the elections. thread inc.
anyway, Araysar made it sound like you were in on the decision that the ban would be irreversible. it's still your show at the end of the day, just making sure democracy still rules here even past just the elections. thread inc.
- 1
Fight
Ahn'Qiraj Raider
- 4,737
- 5,621
I don't give a shit about forum drama and didn't even know all this went down until now. I actually have a real life to live.
I do think it is fucked up that you set up your own ultimatum where someone had to Dox themselves or be banned. WTF guys...
I do think it is fucked up that you set up your own ultimatum where someone had to Dox themselves or be banned. WTF guys...
- 4
Loser Araysar
Chief Russia Reporter. Stock Pals CEO. Head of AI.
- 84,692
- 171,519
Didnt have to dox. Could have blurred out name on check or provide proof in any other way.
Do you think its less fucked up than me forced to go on a caribbean cruise with him just so he could murder me?
- 3
DickTrickle
Definitely NOT Furor Planedefiler
- 13,743
- 16,110
Dude, for the Xth time, there was no doxxing involved. A paycheck with identifying information blurred out is not doxxing anymore than him saying he was a practice squad player in 1997/8.
And yeah, obviously a photoshopped check wouldn't be good enough. That's not the same as blurring it out. One's fake, one has redacted information.
Loser Araysar
Chief Russia Reporter. Stock Pals CEO. Head of AI.
- 84,692
- 171,519
Sure if i claimed to be someone else relentlessly for 10 years and used it to bludgeon people over the head with it or throw it in their faces to win arguments, then the burden of proof would be on me.
But i dont do that because im not a psychopath.
- 1
I told
Araysar
that I would not overturn his ban and that I wouldn't second guess his decision. You guys know the process to overturn a ban and to potentially go over the moderation crew's head to me. You are doing it now. We will see how that goes. I am not stating how I would rule for two reasons, I am not sure what I want yet and if I did and revealed it then it would skew the poll results.
pharmakos
soʞɐɯɹɐɥd
- 16,305
- -2,233
I told
You guys know the process to overturn a ban and to potentially go over the moderation crew's head to me. You are doing it now. We will see how that goes. I am not stating how I would rule for two reasons, I am not sure what I want yet and if I did and revealed it then it would skew the poll results.
right right. again, my confusion was just because Araysar said in a definitive manner that the ban would never be reversed. and again, i just wanted to make sure that we are still adhering to our democratic values we've established. thanks compadre.
Gamma Rays
Large sized member
- 4,058
- 9,745
Just for the sake of a comparison, so Araysar did serve a 1 year ban . . . so what was his year long ban for??
If I can ask that, or are the details / harmful / or if it was a different situation under the old regime.
If I can ask that, or are the details / harmful / or if it was a different situation under the old regime.
Loser Araysar
Chief Russia Reporter. Stock Pals CEO. Head of AI.
- 84,692
- 171,519
I served a ban that was over a year long but i wasnt the exception, other people served long bans for refusing to wear avatars that were a year long. Mine was over a sports bet and i refused to wear a gay Putin avatar.
Im not trotting this out as a sob story. Im just providing context where we banned people for longer for offenses that seem almost comical when you compare it to Utnayans decade long behavior of harassing users, shitting up threads and attempting to dox members.
- 1
- 1
- 1
Gamma Rays
Large sized member
- 4,058
- 9,745
Yeah, cool that does give some comparison & context.
The gay Putin Avatar bet, that does ring a bell.
The gay Putin Avatar bet, that does ring a bell.
Ridas
Pay to play forum
- 2,909
- 4,154
To be honest I wasn't really fair in my post and painted with a broad brush, what I think amod should do in general.
All in all the situation was handled properly except that I don't agree with the lenght of the punishment.
Carry on Brosar and thanks for this awesome thread.
Ossoi
Potato del Grande
- 17,906
- 8,786
Regime
LOADING, PLEASE WAIT...
- 17,364
- 41,761
Zzen
Potato del Grande
- 2,975
- 3,685
zombiewizardhawk
Potato del Grande
- 10,326
- 13,482
I never read any of the olscratch stuff and wasn't impacted by his harassment/etc in any way. Why is he banned and now in a bunch of other trouble? Seems totally unfair, just rickshaw him for 4 days! If you didn't like him, just put him on ignore!
- 2
- 1
- 1
- Status