Djay
Trakanon Raider
- 2,344
- 394
That's basically it...you have to go to 58 games or 116 if you get rid of conferences. You can't even go the division route anymore to add more games that way, because you'd have the same problem where someone is upset because they're in a strong division and playing more division games. Bill Simmons has proposed a system where the bottom 2 seeds are a single-elimination tournament that the bottom 16 teams play for. That's a better solution than no conferences.I know that this doesn't take into account playing more games against weaker divisional opponents, but how do you work all schedules to be fair outside the 58 home/away games played against each other team in the league?
UNLESS...(My proposal)
Drop down to 20 teams. Give everyone 5 years noticed right now...in 2020 we will be dropping to 20 teams and the bottom 10 will be joined by 10 new franchises to form a 2nd league.
Then each team plays the others 4 times (76 game schedule). Top 16 make the playoffs...bottom 4 are relegated to NBA2 and replaced by the Final Four NBA2 teams. All 40 teams have an equal shot at the lottery, so there's no benefit to losing.
Downside is the mudflation that would come from an extra 120 roster spots, but the talent pool would eventually meet the demand (I think there were only 16 teams back in 1970). That's how I would build a league if I could...too drastic of a change for the NBA to ever do it, though. Hell, Bill Simmons idea is too drastic for them.