Felmega_sl
shitlord
- 563
- 1
Well put.There is/are no 'bad graphics', there is only bad art.
Unless you're agreeing with me I don't get what point you're trying to make. I never said simplistic is ugly. I said games are a visual medium and if you're tech limited, work within those boundaries to create a game pleasant on the eyes.Simplicity is a lot more difficult to master than the alternative.
League of Legends is one of the most successful games online, yet the graphics are simplistic. Simplistic does not mean ugly...
I was just building off of your statementUnless you're agreeing with me I don't get what point you're trying to make. I never said simplistic is ugly. I said games are a visual medium and if you're tech limited, work within those boundaries to create a game pleasant on the eyes.
For me I like nice eye candy that pushes my graphics processor. It's more about the advanced shinies versus 'art' to me.There is/are no 'bad graphics', there is only bad art.
Of course, I love specular lighting with shaders and bumpmapping as much as the next guy. But consistent good art is much better than some shiney thrown on to some ugly models.For me I like nice eye candy that pushes my graphics processor. It's more about the advanced shinies versus 'art' to me.
Give me games that look fresh, and not stuff that built for PCs from 2004.
Well, there can be lesser and higher levels of graphical fidelity but you're right, those both really mean nothing if the style/aesthetic is bad. A shiny turd is still a turd.There is/are no 'bad graphics', there is only bad art.