NFL 2015-2016 Season Thread

Ambiturner

Ambiturner

Ssraeszha Raider
16,153
19,740
Pats not looking that impressive against the last 2 shitty teams they played.

The Jets are going to wreck their shit
 
Xevy

Xevy

Log Wizard
9,050
4,287
First: That onside kick was ours. Might've been a sweet 7 points we could've gotten to win. Not to mention with a strong lead we could have let Frank Gore keep gashing the Pats.

Second: Fucking Griff wasn't supposed to snap that ball. Basically it's supposed to draw dum-dums on the special teams (which is where most are) offsides for a free first. Griff fucked that up.

Third: I don't think that formation snap bullshit would've mattered. Our defense hadn't stopped them at that point and whether they were starting on their 35 or ours they probably would've scored.

Fourth: Azeth is a complete retard.

Fifth: I hope the Pats fall down the power rankings because a "poor" Indy team almost beat them. That is the true victory.
 
Chanur

Chanur

Shit Posting Professional
<Aristocrat╭ರ_•́>
30,041
49,793
Thankfully the NFL doesn't use those gay ass power rankings college does. College will always be terrible as long as you have some retards deciding who is the best and not the teams on the field.
 
Hoss

Hoss

Make America's Team Great Again
<Gold Donor>
28,224
18,067
Dalien_sl said:
Nope, never played. I got curious and found this:



So I'll concede that they are measuring accurately using the chains. It's still real retarded, sir. They should have GPS and cameras and sensors in the football and shit. We aren't savages.
Click to expand...
Unless you have military grade GPS, the accuracy is artificially limited to like 3 yards. I think the military GPS's are accurate to within about 1 foot. Even if we decide 1 foot is good enough, the 3 yard accuracy they could actually get wouldn't work.

Hell of a play on that block, but I'm surprised he wasn't flagged. I know the replay showed he cleanly leaped over the center, but I'm sure just about everyone else was like me and initially thought he had to have stepped on someone. Good job by all the refs seeing that and not throwing out laundry.

On the trick play, clearly bellicheat hacked into the colts headsets and called that play himself. It's the only way to explain how NONE of them remembered the formation well enough from Jr High to know to call it off.

#SwingingGategate
 
Drakurii

Drakurii

Aten Ha Ra Slayer
15,434
50,771
Xevy_sl said:
Fifth: I hope the Pats fall down the power rankings because a "poor" Indy team almost beat them. That is the true victory.
Click to expand...
Almost beat them LOL, they have the probowl where the almost winners play at the end of the year...I'm sure Luck will be present.
 
C

Creslin

Trakanon Raider
2,508
1,153
Hoss_sl said:
Unless you have military grade GPS, the accuracy is artificially limited to like 3 yards. I think the military GPS's are accurate to within about 1 foot. Even if we decide 1 foot is good enough, the 3 yard accuracy they could actually get wouldn't work.

Hell of a play on that block, but I'm surprised he wasn't flagged. I know the replay showed cleanly leaped over the center, but I'm sure just about everyone else was like me and initially thought he had to have stepped on someone. Good job by all the refs seeing that and not throwing out laundry.

On the trick play, clearly bellicheat hacked into the colts headsets and called that play himself.

#SwingingGategate
Click to expand...
GPS isn't the right tech for it but I think people mean it should use sensors in the balls and on the field and just mistake that for GPS.
 
zombiewizardhawk

zombiewizardhawk

Potato del Grande
10,305
13,460
Sutekh just salty because his team is trash this year (read: every year) so he has to cry about the team he wishes his team was every time the possibility presents itself.
 
Dalien

Dalien

Registered Hodor
2,206
2,069
Creslin_sl said:
GPS isn't the right tech for it but I think people mean it should use sensors in the balls and on the field and just mistake that for GPS.
Click to expand...
Yeah I meant GPS on a smaller scale, not using satellites and shit. We're quite capable of tracking the precise position of an object such as a football. We have the technology. (source: PHY100 Lab I had to take a few years ago).

It will never happen though because the NFL considers things like pylon cams at the goal lines as an extravagant expense.
 
Dalien

Dalien

Registered Hodor
2,206
2,069
Cards post game interviews are funny. We lost because we only prepared for dumb dumb Vick. When they put Landry Jones in it opened up their whole playbook because he's actually smart and knows all the plays.
 
Voldeth

Voldeth

Trakanon Raider
1,271
622
Xevy_sl said:
One recovered onside kick call from winning by 1.
Click to expand...
That's only true if the Patriots would have played the game in the exact same fashion had things worked out for Indy, which obviously isn't the case. Indy should take solace in the fact that it was a much closer game then the 'experts' gave them credit for but to say that they were one play away from beating the Pats is stupid. The Patriots played the score in the 4th quarter, just like any good team does. They protected the side lines and guarded against giving up 'the big play' on defense while their offense was satisfied with taking no risks and having Blount run the ball on every down. That isn't at all how they would have played it if they didn't have a two TD lead.
 
Xevy

Xevy

Log Wizard
9,050
4,287
Voldeth_sl said:
That's only true if the Patriots would have played the game in the exact same fashion had things worked out for Indy, which obviously isn't the case. Indy should take solace in the fact that it was a much closer game then the 'experts' gave them credit for but to say that they were one play away from beating the Pats is stupid. The Patriots played the score in the 4th quarter, just like any good team does. They protected the side lines and guarded against giving up 'the big play' on defense while their offense was satisfied with taking no risks and having Blount run the ball on every down. That isn't at all how they would have played it if they didn't have a two TD lead.
Click to expand...
We stopped running (6 yards per carry) when we fell behind on the scoreboard due to time concerns. If we had recovered the onside kick that we recovered, we may have been up, we may have burned clock and yards with Gore, and the Pats may have played hastily and lost. We'll never know.

You nerdburglars saying LESS than 7 points isn't "close" are dumb.
 
Voldeth

Voldeth

Trakanon Raider
1,271
622
Xevy_sl said:
We stopped running (6 yards per carry) when we fell behind on the scoreboard due to time concerns. If we had recovered the onside kick that we recovered, we may have been up, we may have burned clock and yards with Gore, and the Pats may have played hastily and lost. We'll never know.

You nerdburglars saying LESS than 7 points isn't "close" are dumb.
Click to expand...
That was my point. It's a completely different game if X play happens differently, which is why saying that 'had one play gone differently we would have won by 1' is bad logic. This is only ever true if that one play is almost at the end of the game (i.e. the Superbowl).

Not to pick on you but the score did end 34-27. In reference to the 'less than 7 points' argument. :p
 
Xeldar

Xeldar

Silver Squire
1,546
133
The amount of hate people have for the pats; I wish the pats would come out to the imperial march.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.