NFL 2015-2016 Season Thread

Phazael

Confirmed Beta Shitlord, Fat Bastard
<Gold Donor>
15,025
32,782
Just in time for 5 easy games in a row where he can look like a hero, too. Problem for the Roidhawks is if Sherman is getting beat by guys picked up off the waiver wire (and they are actually flagging him for riding receivers around like a rented mule this year) and Lynch is getting contained, Chancellor is not going to fix their main issues. What he will do is help them beat the cardinals.

I am in the bandwagon of the Cards looking great but Palmer not having any chance of remaining healthy all year, but even if he did I don't see the Cards making it by GB even with home field. They have not typically been able to keep up with quality offenses, even with Palmer under center. I do like their team a lot and it would be nice for Fitz to get a ring finally, but I just don't see it even if they keep Palmer alive all season.
 

Alex

Still a Music Elitist
14,791
7,564
Just in time for 5 easy games in a row where he can look like a hero, too.
I'm going to laugh at you faggots so hard when the Bengals roll up the Seahawks. It ain't in Seattle. Oh, also a place where Dalton already won.
 

Kreugen

Vyemm Raider
6,599
793
I have no idea how all these professional analysts don't understand the #1 rule of the NFL. If you don't have a QB you don't have a team. Taylor is better than Manuel but they're both still fucking bad.
There are way too many "game manager at best" QBs and other one-and-done types with Super Bowl rings to make such a statement I'm afraid.

Fuck it, NFL matchups are so ludicrously complex that winning a knockout/survival league year after year is about as random as being a world roulette champion.
 

Phazael

Confirmed Beta Shitlord, Fat Bastard
<Gold Donor>
15,025
32,782
There are way too many "game manager at best" QBs and other one-and-done types with Super Bowl rings to make such a statement I'm afraid.

Fuck it, NFL matchups are so ludicrously complex that winning a knockout/survival league year after year is about as random as being a world roulette champion.
Yeah Eli Manning has two rings, for fucks sake. The bummer is teams overpay for average QB talent because it is so important just to not have a complete fuckstick under center and it can bite them in the ass when the actual talented guys in other positions look at some guy getting paid like he is Joe Montana when he is really more like Kyle Orton. It corrodes the team long term. Its what happened with Cutler. I also think its happening to a lesser extent in Seattle and Baltimore, but they basically had no choice unless they want to take a turn on the Fitzmagic/Cassel lottery down the road.
 

Kirun

Buzzfeed Editor
19,976
16,414

Tenks

Bronze Knight of the Realm
14,163
607
I'm going to laugh at you faggots so hard when the Bengals roll up the Seahawks. It ain't in Seattle. Oh, also a place where Dalton already won.
Seattle's offensive line is abysmal and our defensive line is going to eat it.
 

Creslin

Trakanon Raider
2,508
1,153
There are way too many "game manager at best" QBs and other one-and-done types with Super Bowl rings to make such a statement I'm afraid.

Fuck it, NFL matchups are so ludicrously complex that winning a knockout/survival league year after year is about as random as being a world roulette champion.
Guys who aren't top 5 QBs win SBs quite a bit recently, but guys outside the top 10? The worst two QBs to win a SB in the last decade are probably Eli Manning and Russel Wilson. With a dilfer type the giants lose both those superbowls. So I guess he wins with the Hawks but Wilson played pretty good to get to that SB even if he didn't need to play well in the game itself.

The odds of you making it through the playoffs without needing your QB to step up and help win a game are just too low, now other guys than just the top 5 can step up but a real game manager like Tyrod or Smith is pretty likely to be faced with that situation and come up short sending his team home.
 

Kreugen

Vyemm Raider
6,599
793
Isn't the whole genesis of the "game manager" label a low turnover rate offsetting a low yardage output?
 

Tenks

Bronze Knight of the Realm
14,163
607
Isn't the whole genesis of the "game manager" label a low turnover rate offsetting a low yardage output?
Generally yes but everyone says Alex Smith is a textbook game manager and he has like a 1.8 TD:INT ratio. Fact is Wilson protects the ball and also makes plays with his legs. He is far from a game manager.
 

zombiewizardhawk

Potato del Grande
10,305
13,460
Wilson has an absurd TD:INT ratio. I can't fathom why people undervalue the guy.
He's probably underinflating balls or cheating them in some other way, because as we learned with the Patriots and fumbles, it's impossible to have good turnover stats without cheating.
 

Merrith

Golden Baronet of the Realm
18,785
7,361
Isn't the whole genesis of the "game manager" label a low turnover rate offsetting a low yardage output?
Basically what the label evolved into. Guys who weren't asked to throw the ball as much or make a lot of dangerous throws. The "good" ones at it would naturally have lower totals in each. I'm trying to think of "game managers" that have won SB's. Dilfer, maybe Brad Johnson qualifies with Tampa. Eli is a little murkier. In '07 he was 12th in passing yards with 23 TD's and 20 picks. In 2011 though, he was 4th in passing yards with 4,933, along with 29 TD's and 16 picks. That year, at the very least is absolutely not "game manager" status.
 

Tenks

Bronze Knight of the Realm
14,163
607
He's probably underinflating balls or cheating them in some other way, because as we learned with the Patriots and fumbles, it's impossible to have good turnover stats without cheating.
Holy fuck not everything relates back to the fucking Patriots and your anal best friend Brady
 

Merrith

Golden Baronet of the Realm
18,785
7,361
it's impossible to have good turnover stats without cheating.
rodgersbelt_575.jpg