- 1,841
- 452
Looks like San Diego will have a team still:Statement from Dean Spanos | San Diego Chargers
Lol. Fucking Spanos.
Lol. Fucking Spanos.
Really an egg and the chicken argument. How many wins has Belichick had without Brady at the helm? Belichick is 52-62 when Brady has not played the majority of the snaps. Sure, he's extremely smart, talented, and experienced. But having a talent like Brady sure helps. Just ask Tony Dungy how nice it is to have a good QB when it's time to get a ring.belichick in his stint with the patriots 256 games (regular season) 187 -69 or .73%
i'll take that,, even his overall % he is 13th lifetime- and of those higher than him,,only shula and halas have more games coached than him most of the others are in the 4-15 years coached lifetime .
A lot of times in statistical analysis you remove outlier data. It's not like I just introduced some foreign idea.Yeah ... if you just simply remove 20% of his losses his record looks good!
Are you retarded?
There's a difference between eliminating an outlier because it doesn't accurately represent the facts vs disregarding 20% of the data because it doesn't fit your narrative.A lot of times in statistical analysis you remove outlier data. It's not like I just introduced some foreign idea.
Wow I never realized Madden was higher than Lombardi....thats crazy. But hey, the guy did figure out you win if you score more points than the other team AND invented the turducken for the Cowboys Olines of the 90s to eat on Thanksgiving while he masturbated and watched.That .500 level is a huuuge drop off in quality. I'm not saying Rex is a bad coach, he's been in two largely dysfunctional or rebuilding organizations so far, but the gap between .500 and the good HC's is significant.
Sort by win/loss %
Coaches, Records, and Coaching Totals | Pro-Football-Reference.com
Even old 8-8 Jeff Fisher is hovering just above.
And ONLY .66? That's over336 games!That's INSANE! Of course more things factor in to this but still.
Stafford is about to be exposed as being fucking terrible.Calvin Johnson apparently hanging it up. Sucks he wasn't with a more competitive team.
More like some other garbage receiver is going to start putting up video game numbersStafford is about to be exposed as being fucking terrible.
I disagree. I would be very disappointed in any team I like taking a back in the first two rounds. There are a few guys that truly are better than everyone else (Peterson), but you are just as likely to get a Richardson going early. Rushing is all about the play calling and the offensive line. Picking up a quality lineman will do more for your run game than any running backThis is the main thing, although not all backs are as scheme dependent. Also, just in general, Murray went from one of the best run blocking O lines (and frankly one of the best overall) in the league to one in the bottom half of the league. I do think some RB's are still worth a 1st or a 2nd round pick, but as you said, guys like Peterson and Gurley are the exception and not the rule.
Detroit claims another. Never forgive them for Barry Sanders.Calvin Johnson apparently hanging it up. Sucks he wasn't with a more competitive team.
Forget the numbers, just watch his play. He is one of the all time greatsTough to call an all time great when he was on such bad teams. He put up insane numbers, but when you're always losing you have to pass a lot.