Ambiturner
Ssraeszha Raider
- 16,154
- 19,740
Did someone actually say Brissett was great or are you just still butthurt over my jab that he was better than Romo?
Yeah, dude. The whole forum still hasn't recovered from that sick, sick burn
- 2
- 1
Did someone actually say Brissett was great or are you just still butthurt over my jab that he was better than Romo?
If the Bills beat the 49'ers Sunday will we have some Bills fans crawling out of their caves and posting on this forum?
If the Bills beat the 49'ers Sunday will we have some Bills fans crawling out of their caves and posting on this forum?
You're a very obtuse person. This is why no one likes you.Comparing 90's football to today's football. Just Itlan things.
It's tough to say. The football gods, they are fickle. I expect a 4th win in a row just because the 49ers aren't that good and Kaep isn't going to be enough of a difference if Chip doesn't change his play calling. The defense does look better and as long as Shady doesn't blow a knee or something they should be just good enough on offense to win more games than not. Just don't ask Tyrod to win games for you. He's no Dak.It's weird, they were 0-2 and looking terrible, but then got the gift that is having a West Coast Team (Arizona) have to come east for a 1pm EST game, followed by the Pats having to start their injured 3rd string QB, followed by the universe not allowing a Jeff Fisher team to be 3 games above .500.
Real change for the better or crazy circumstances to give them 3 wins in a row?
Yeah, dude. The whole forum still hasn't recovered from that sick, sick burn
You're a very obtuse person. This is why no one likes you.
Because Steve Young didn't have a four year run at the beginning of the 90s with a QB rating over 100 in each season right? Or a season where he went 35-10 TD-Int ratio? Or have a career rating of 97 where as Bledsoe's is dog shit?
I mean it's not like Marino threw for 48 TDs in 19 fucking 84 or anything. You're absolutely right, it's impossible for Bledsoe to have been a competent quarterback during the 90s because of the way football was played. The situations are TOTALLY comparable.
Take a seat you fat fuck.
Romo still led the league, over guys like Aaron Rodgers, Tom Brady, and Peyton Manning aka generational talents, with a 113 QB rating. I understand the game has changed, that's still not an excuse to say the Dak-Romo situation is a mirror of the Bledsoe-Brady situation. They're fucking WORLDS apart.It's not that useful to only use outliers for comparison purposes. You're using generational talents. There have been a multitude of rule changes that have positively affected the passing game.
In 1984, Marino's huge year, there were four QBs with a rating over 90, 3 in 1985, 3 in 1986, 3 in 1987. This year, there are 15, 19 in 2015, 16 in 2014. I'm not saying QB rating is the end all, be all stat, but I think there is some relevance there.
Edit: Even better, in Steve Young's 1992 season, where he had a 107.0 rating, only one other QB had a rating over 90. That shows you just how damn good he was.
Romo still led the league, over guys like Aaron Rodgers, Tom Brady, and Peyton Manning aka generational talents, with a 113 QB rating. I understand the game has changed, that's still not an excuse to say the Dak-Romo situation is a mirror of the Bledsoe-Brady situation. They're fucking WORLDS apart.
I'm glad we can agree on this part. The game has certainly evolved, but it's not like Romo is propped up because of the times - he would've been an elite QB in any era.Yeah, I edited in a line agreeing with that sentiment after my post. Dak would be replacing about a top 5 QB (on average) while Brady replaced a completely average one. Much different scenario.
I'll give Romo credit for good in any era, but elite is a stretch. He's played 6 playoff games and won 2...
If the Bills beat the 49'ers Sunday will we have some Bills fans crawling out of their caves and posting on this forum?
No one circles the wagons like...Has there ever been a Bills fan?
Has there ever been a Bills fan?