Upgrading from 24" 1080p 60hz to 34" 2560x1080 144hz was the absolutely biggest upgrade I've experienced in an entire decade and that will cost me considerably less over time than spending that kind of money on anything inside the PC. I really don't understand the people who still game on 22" FHD displays even though they can easily afford high end systems.
It's some sort of weird logic that only the PC matters. The PC itself can cost just about anything, but a monitor must be under than €200, the mouse and the keyboard must be under €30 each (and some play on the garbage shit the PC came with) and the headphones were 19.95€. Buying a 2080ti? Sure. Buying a 500€ monitor that will actually last you twice as long as that 2080ti? No fucking way.
If the leaked 3080ti benchmarks are close to accurate holy shit it's good
I feel like % gain leaks are generally pretty accurateBelieve it when it's in the hands of real gamers.
Supposedly the 3080 but I don't think we really know for sure yet. 30% for the 3080TI would be very underwhelming honestly after a 2 year product cycle.Is a 30% increase for 3080TI > 2080TI that good? Or is that actually the 3080?
Is a 30% increase for 3080TI > 2080TI that good? Or is that actually the 3080?
Yeah I'm just asking what's supposedly in that graphI thought I read somewhere that Nvidia's top card was going to be the 3090, not the 3080? If that's true, that's probably the card you'd want to compare to the 2080TI.
"and AMD should be worried"Dude! That's a nutzo leap!
View attachment 279752
- 30.98% better than a stock RTX 2080 Ti Founders Edition
- 21.07% better than a stock MSI RTX 2080 Ti Lightning Z
- 22.14% better than a stock Nvidia Titan RTX
- 8.30% better than the best Nvidia Titan V result under LN2
- 2.18% less than KINGPIN’s overclocked EVGA RTX 2080 Ti XC
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 benchmarks just leaked — and AMD should be worried
Leaked GeForce RTX 3080 benchmarks promise big bump over RTX 2080 Tiwww.tomsguide.com
I'll be replacing my 2080 with whatever the top ends up being called. Historically I haven't done that though."and AMD should be worried"
exactly as I called it in post #112. The super expensive niche card will dominate media articles, no matter how competitive AMD will actually be in the $200-$350 segment.
I for one don't give a flying fuck about how many percentages the 3090 will be above the 2080ti. The vast majority wouldn't, if they're being honest.
Steam Hardware survey - you know what I would really love to see there? How many actual systems both had a 1080ti and a 2080ti in them. How many people actually upgrade the last gen top card with the latest top card. I know a few people who actually do buy the top end graphics card for their PCs, and one of them for example upgraded from a 980 to a 2080ti. He skipped the 1080 generation completely because it made no sense to put down that kind of money again right away. I don't know anyone who ever replaced a 980 with a 1080, or a 1080 with a 2080, ti or not.
3090 should be the codename for the next Titan, the card that costs 2x as much with no real benefit in games.
Both companies can pump out a comparable level of performance, even if AMD has completely balked on two generations of high end. If AMD doesn't put out a good high end card this gen, Nvidia could probably get away with even worse price hikes.
Yeah don't count on Intel. They have a solid 2 years before they could possibly have anything that rivals discrete solutions.