Doesn't the 10900K actually use a hell of a lot more than 125W?Only really in single-core and dual-core performance - by around 5%. In OC situations, it also beats the 10900 in quad-core performance, by about 3%, but I NEVER OC shit. In "average" quad-core performance, they're basically equal. But, the 10900 seems to be about 7% faster in octa core performance. It also is slightly less power efficient than the 5800, using around 125w versus 105 on the 5800. 10900 obviously smokes the fuck out of it in multi-core mixed speed, but that's for server-based shit that probably won't matter.
Intel Core i9-10900K Review: Ten Cores, 5.3 GHz, and Excessive Power Draw
Kick the tires and light the TDP fires
www.tomshardware.com
"During those tests, we recorded up to 332W of power consumption when paired with either the Corsair H115i 280mm AIO watercooler or a Noctua NH-D15S air cooler."
Second source:
- 1
- 1