Szlia
Member
It means comedy is hard.What does this mean haha?
- 1
It means comedy is hard.What does this mean haha?
Oppenheimer. It's an exceptional film. But it is not a good movie. Beautiful to look at with remarkable costume design (I mean GREAT suits). But it is neither a good biography nor does it take a stand on Oppenheimer the man.
There is a strange schism about 30% into the movie when I thought I would learn about the man. As if this was to be a deep biopic. It's about the time in the film when we discover that he was so brilliant that he could learn Sanskrit and pick languages in a matter of weeks, Then it shifts to (kind of) tell the story of the building of the atomic bomb. But it never really achieves that either. Then it becomes a bad courtroom drama.
It fails on too many levels. I feel very dissatisfied that I never understood Oppenheimer, the incredible story of the construction of the first atomic bomb, or any science. 0 for 3...
But lovely to watch, as long as you have patience.
For anyone wanting a weirder but more in-depth biography of Oppenheimer (and especially how he became vilified), Watch "American Experience: The trials of J Robert Oppenheimer."
It's about as dry as toasted Zwieback, but you'll learn a lot more fascinating things about the man than the film that bears his name.
These days you would say he "was on the spectrum."My take from it was he was a barely functioning sociopath who assembled a team of geniuses to do all the scientific heavy lifting and took all the credit for their work. I’m sure that’s not the case but it’s how the movie seemed to portray him.
Oppenheimer. It's an exceptional film. But it is not a good movie. Beautiful to look at with remarkable costume design (I mean GREAT suits). But it is neither a good biography nor does it take a stand on Oppenheimer the man.
There is a strange schism about 30% into the movie when I thought I would learn about the man. As if this was to be a deep biopic. It's about the time in the film when we discover that he was so brilliant that he could learn Sanskrit and pick languages in a matter of weeks, Then it shifts to (kind of) tell the story of the building of the atomic bomb. But it never really achieves that either. Then it becomes a bad courtroom drama.
It fails on too many levels. I feel very dissatisfied that I never understood Oppenheimer, the incredible story of the construction of the first atomic bomb, or any science. 0 for 3...
But lovely to watch, as long as you have patience.
For anyone wanting a weirder but more in-depth biography of Oppenheimer (and especially how he became vilified), Watch "American Experience: The trials of J Robert Oppenheimer."
It's about as dry as toasted Zwieback, but you'll learn a lot more fascinating things about the man than the film that bears his name.
That sounds familiar. We talking about Musk or Oppenheimer?!My take from it was he was a barely functioning sociopath who assembled a team of geniuses to do all the scientific heavy lifting and took all the credit for their work. I’m sure that’s not the case but it’s how the movie seemed to portray him.
maybe i missed something, but this similar to how i felt when it was over. it went from yay we made a bomb to somehow he's the bad guy. i didn't get it. and i couldn't not see tony stark anytime RDJ was on screen.This pretty much sums up the movie for me too. By the end I was just like uh what was this movie even about other than the making of the bomb lol
The link I put in the post is the entire "American Experience" episode-- free on you tube.This is free on Peacock.