Red Pill Thread 2.0: Neckbeard Revenge

  • Guest, it's time once again for the massively important and exciting FoH Asshat Tournament!



    Go here and give us your nominations!
    Who's been the biggest Asshat in the last year? Give us your worst ones!
khalid

khalid

Unelected Mod
14,071
6,775
Dumar_sl said:
And in that regard, the answer is yes, women are mostly the same.
Click to expand...
So your mom, your sister, your nieces, marie curie, sasha gray, mother teresa, rosa luxembourg, rosa parks, they were all mostly the same as far as sexual desire?

You seriously can't believe that is a scientific statement.
 
Soygen

Soygen

The Dirty Dozen For the Price of One
<Nazi Janitors>
28,431
44,760
Please post some more RL pics, everyone. I'm almost there...
 
D

Dumar_sl

shitlord
3,712
4
I've ... linked study after study, scholarly journals, researcher homepages. My lexicon I used to describe is not religious, yours is. I truly don't think you realize what I'm saying.

Thevery wordsyou use to conceptualize your interpersonal relationship have no basis in reality, but you use them as if they're real. That's religious. Describing a relationship by 'how much you love someone' is jumping through the same idealistic mental hoops as a priest stating 'facts' about the nature of the supernatural. The words he uses to describe are describing something with no basis in reality, yet he uses the words as if they're as concrete as well ... concrete.

You and society do the same thing, and it's a religious interpretation of what's going on, of relationships.
 
F

Firewater Burns_sl

shitlord
1,098
13
Yo Bros, The Art of Manliness has this covered. Work sited and all that shit! BRONDO for life!
Art of Manliness - Myth of the Alpha Male

Conclusion

It is neither the alpha nor the beta male that is most desired by women.

Taken together, the research suggests that the ideal man (for a date or romantic partner) is one who is assertive, confident, easygoing, and sensitive, without being aggressive, demanding, dominant, quiet, shy, or submissive. In other words, a prestigious man, not a dominant man.

In fact, it appears that the prestigious man who is high in both assertiveness and kindness is considered the most attractive to women for both short-term affairs and long-term relationships. This research should offer some assurance that the genuinely nice, passionate kid who learns a culturally valued skill can be immensely attractive.

Further, seeking to become a prestigious man is not only the surest route to success with women, but achievement in any area of life.
Click to expand...
P.S. With all this talk about Ant's eyes, exactly how long have yall been staring into them?
 
D

Dumar_sl

shitlord
3,712
4
khalid_sl said:
So your mom, your sister, your nieces, marie curie, sasha gray, mother teresa, rosa luxembourg, rosa parks, they were all mostly the same as far as sexual desire?

You seriously can't believe that is a scientific statement.
Click to expand...
Are you asking do they desire the same characteristics? And the answer is absolutely.
 
D

Dumar_sl

shitlord
3,712
4
ZyyzYzzy

ZyyzYzzy

RIP USA
<Banned>
25,295
48,789
Dumar_sl said:
I've ... linked study after study, scholarly journals, researcher homepages. My lexicon I used to describe is not religious, yours is. I truly don't think you realize what I'm saying.

Thevery wordsyou use to conceptualize your interpersonal relationship have no basis in reality, but you use them as if they're real. That's religious. Describing a relationship by 'how much you love someone' is jumping through the same idealistic mental hoops as a priest stating 'facts' about the nature of the supernatural. The words he uses to describe are describing something with no basis in reality, yet he uses the words as if they're as concrete as well ... concrete.

You and society do the same thing, and it's a religious interpretation of what's going on, of relationships.
Click to expand...
You linked papers describing effect of the endocrine system on women. You can't look at one specific area and use it to generalize complex social interactions, and internal thoughts.

I have never described my interpersonal relationship with my wife to you. How do you know it is not based in reality? Seriously, how do you know what I feel towards her? It's all just hormones driving everything, no higher neuronal processes at work.

Show me neruoethological studies on relationships, not just ones correlating spiking hormonal levels to sexual drive and desire.
 
F

Firewater Burns_sl

shitlord
1,098
13
rrr_img_76022.jpg
 
Lejina

Lejina

(╯°□°）╯︵ ┻━┻
<Bronze Donator>
4,670
12,174
ZyyzYzzy_sl said:
shitty photo, but the only one where I was capable of cropping out my wife or child. BTW antarius, I'm master alpha race, 6'3"
Click to expand...
Sorry bro, eyeglasses mean poor eyesight which means poor genes which means beta. Better accept Dumar as your alpha superior. Science.
 
ZyyzYzzy

ZyyzYzzy

RIP USA
<Banned>
25,295
48,789
Dumar_sl said:
Are you asking do they desire the same characteristics? And the answer is absolutely.
Click to expand...
Wrong. Do innate desires exist? Yes, but you are overlooking societal norms and practices which also affect desirable characteristics.

Not only that, there are different innate desirable characteristics that certainly vary from individual to individual.

You are over generalizing and as a result, exhibiting as what you reprieve are the most desirable characteristics through your religious rituals you attract shitty women
 
Jive Turkey

Jive Turkey

Karen
6,720
9,081
Dumar_sl said:
I've ... linked study after study, scholarly journals, researcher homepages. My lexicon I used to describe is not religious, yours is. I truly don't think you realize what I'm saying.

Thevery wordsyou use to conceptualize your interpersonal relationship have no basis in reality, but you use them as if they're real. That's religious. Describing a relationship by 'how much you love someone' is jumping through the same idealistic mental hoops as a priest stating 'facts' about the nature of the supernatural. The words he uses to describe are describing something with no basis in reality, yet he uses the words as if they're as concrete as well ... concrete.

You and society do the same thing, and it's a religious interpretation of what's going on, of relationships.
Click to expand...
You're such a fucking idiot. Why do you think the emotion of love doesn't exist? Do you honestly think the same chemical and electrical processes that make you feel shame for your ugly face aren't the same processes that create the very real feeling of love? I realize you're on this pseudo-macho trip at this moment in your life, so "nah man, love is just a modern construct, bro" really speaks to you. But it's a fucking ridiculous statement. The emotion we call love is just as important in evolution as physical attractiveness (my condolences to you). You feel anger. You feel shame. You feel happiness. Yet you want to deny that an actual feeling called love exists. You're a tool. Andyourlanguage betrays your ingrained hatred for women every time you say something like this "all women are sluts. Sure, they have the ability to choose not to be sluts" instead of this "All women can choose to have multiple sexual partners. Sure, they can also choose not to". It's your blatant insecurities that lead you to say the former. Post your picture
 
ZyyzYzzy

ZyyzYzzy

RIP USA
<Banned>
25,295
48,789
Jive Turkey_sl said:
You're such a fucking idiot. Why do you think the emotion of love doesn't exist? Do you honestly think the same chemical and electrical processes that make you feel shame for your ugly face aren't the same processes that create the very real feeling of love? I realize you're on this pseudo-macho trip at this moment in your life, so "nah man, love is just a modern construct, bro" really speaks to you. But it's a fucking ridiculous statement. The emotion we call love is just as important in evolution as physical attractiveness (my condolences to you). You feel anger. You feel shame. You feel happiness. Yet you want to deny that an actual feeling called love exists. You're a tool. Andyourlanguage betrays your ingrained hatred for women every time you say something like this "all women are sluts. Sure, they have the ability to choose not to be sluts" instead of this "All women can choose to have multiple sexual partners. Sure, they can also choose not to". It's your blatant insecurities that lead you to say the former. Post your picture
Click to expand...
"Love is just a scam invented by Disney"

Is that in the RP'er bible?

Edit - and before Dumar spouts that it isn't real, love can be examined in other mammals too, as all other complex emotions.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.