I don't care. I don't think Scream is a "bad" poster or a "worse" poster than anyone, I know who I like, and don't, and why but that, in all honesty, is not relevant. If you want to see Booze thread-banned then make the case, that won't get Scream un-thread-banned though. The two are separate cases and should be looked at like separate cases. It is not about their politics, it isn't about mine either.If it isn’t about the spectrum how come Booze can post anywhere on this forum? Legit interested if you think he is better or worse than Scream just as a poster whether you agree with his politics.
If I remember correctly, and I probably do not, it was not that you were posting links but that you continued to do so after you two had been told to knock the shit off and you continued anyway. It had gotten really spammy between you, he stopped, you didn't and thus you got shawed. Without a direct link to the conversations in question I cannot do much more than guess-remember so don't take what I say as gospel.I was shawed for posting twitter links while responding to Zap twitter links...Not snarky ones either. Actual rebuttles to his twitter spam. One of us got infractions and the other...well I can only guess how many twitter links he has posted today.
Dude, my head has never been screwed on right. You learn to live with it as best you can.How unscrewed is your head right now?
If that is what you want to think, neat.It's about him rustling the jimmies of grown men who can't use the ignore feature because they've convinced themselves that it will make them less of a man, so they just report the derails instead. And since Scream isn't liked: it's easy to punish him for bullshit as few are going to raise a stink.
Scream is an asshole. But the section ban shit is faggotry of the highest level, almost as bad as the discouraged mode shit that LLR used months ago on what's his face.
- 1