Science!! Fucking magnets, how do they work?

  • Guest, it's time once again for the massively important and exciting FoH Asshat Tournament!



    Go here and give us your nominations!
    Who's been the biggest Asshat in the last year? Give us your worst ones!
wormie

Asshat wormie

2023 Asshat Award Winner
<Gold Donor>
16,820
30,968


A warning to autists: uses an image of phages towards then end while sort of discussing current pandemic. Proceed at your own peril.

A warning to smooth brains: contains complex numbers. Wear a helmet!
 
  • 2Like
Reactions: 1 users
chthonic-anemos

chthonic-anemos

bitchute.com/video/EvyOjOORbg5l/
8,606
27,290
wormie said:


A warning to autists: uses an image of phages towards then end while sort of discussing current pandemic. Proceed at your own peril.

A warning to smooth brains: contains complex numbers. Wear a helmet!
Click to expand...

I liked when the dots fled civilization and went to live in the wilderness.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user
wormie

Asshat wormie

2023 Asshat Award Winner
<Gold Donor>
16,820
30,968
Furry said:
Why do dead people give pressure on the living in his simulations? It's cute, but not well thought out.
Click to expand...
Here you go smooth brain:

The SIR Model for Spread of Disease - The Differential Equation Model | Mathematical Association of America

www.maa.org www.maa.org

If you look at 5 you will see the -k*i(t) term. This is the change in the number of recovered or dead (those that cant get the disease anymore one way or another) people at each time step. The number of recovered (or dead) reduces the number of those who can still get sick and thus there is a "pressure" on the remaining population.

Of course I am 95% certain you just looked at images bouncing back and forth, called it pressure and spewed stupid shit into this thread. But its ok, the -k*i(t) term is a negative number and thus is incredibly confusing if ones brain is smooth. Dont be concerned, we understand.
 
  • 1Picard
Reactions: 1 user
Furry

Furry

🌭🍔🇺🇦✌️SLAVA UKRAINI!✌️🇺🇦🍔🌭
<Gold Donor>
22,489
29,665
wormie said:
Here you go smooth brain:

The SIR Model for Spread of Disease - The Differential Equation Model | Mathematical Association of America

www.maa.org www.maa.org

If you look at 5 you will see the -k*i(t) term. This is the change in the number of recovered or dead (those that cant get the disease anymore one way or another) people at each time step. The number of recovered (or dead) reduces the number of those who can still get sick and thus there is a "pressure" on the remaining population.

Of course I am 95% certain you just looked at images bouncing back and forth, called it pressure and spewed stupid shit into this thread. But its ok, the -k*i(t) term is a negative number and thus is incredibly confusing if ones brain is smooth. Dont be concerned, we understand.
Click to expand...
lol, here comes the super genius. 2000 years of mathematical theorization. Nah fuck that, some guy made a video.
 
  • 1Dislike
Reactions: 1 user
wormie

Asshat wormie

2023 Asshat Award Winner
<Gold Donor>
16,820
30,968
Furry said:
lol, here comes the super genius. 2000 years of mathematical theorization. Nah fuck that, some guy made a video.
Click to expand...
As opposed to some furry who has dismissed both the fields of physics and epidemiology in their entirety so far. Relax smooth brain, anyone with above average IQ here already knows you are a retard, you cant hide it so there is no need to pretend.
 
  • 1Picard
Reactions: 1 user
Fucker

Fucker

Log Wizard
13,124
30,204
Haha, I triggered oldfag withe the lipstick comment.

w.jpg
 
  • 7Worf
  • 3Like
  • 1Solidarity
Reactions: 11 users
pharmakos

pharmakos

soʞɐɯɹɐɥd
<Bronze Donator>
16,305
-2,233
MusicForFish said:
Electronics made from Skin

One day, we may be building electronic devices from our own skin. Melanin, the pigment responsible for coloring our skin and hair, could be one of the building blocks of the bionic implants and technology of tomorrow.

Using a newly discovered technique, scientists can drastically improve the pigment’s ability to conduct electricity. In fact, Italian nanoscientist Paolo Tassini and his colleagues have managed to increase the conductivity of melanin a billion times over.

Typically, eumelanin, the most common form of melanin, is composed of millions of sheets piled chaotically on top of each other. The group of researchers has discovered a method for heating up the material in a vacuum to radically improve its conductivity. During the process, the sheets are brought out of disarray and arrange themselves in a parallel configuration.

It is thought that eumelanin may take the place of metals in bioelectronic devices like brain implants in the future. The pigment is naturally produced in our bodies, and for that reason, our immune system is more likely to accept it than a substance like copper.
Click to expand...

chthonic-anemos said:
ahcAnST.gif

Click to expand...


It does sort of add well to the whole "the human race was originally a genetically engineered slave race developed by an alien civilization" theory. After the aliens abandoned our species here, over time as normal, natural, "chaotic" evolution took over the eumelanin that used to form precise circuits ended up easily losing its synthetic complexity and returned to something resembling life as we know it (the kangz)
 
  • 2Picard
  • 1Like
  • 1Jonesing
Reactions: 3 users
Lithose

Lithose

Buzzfeed Editor
25,946
113,037
So I've been doing a lot of reading on the Delayed Choice Quantum Eraser experiment...Its kind of freaking me out. Anyone got any decent layman books on the subject specifically?

Its freaking me out because I had always assumed that interaction during measurement is what collapsed wave functions. So the "observer" didn't need to actually record data, merely the act of measurement itself brought returned a wave function to a discreet particle. This made sense to me, because to measure something you need some kind of interaction, and I imagined interaction forced the 'wave' to coalesce at a certain point (I know that's not how it really works, its just how I imagined it).

But the delayed choice quantum eraser proved that's not the case. I'm not sure how familiar you guys are with the original quantum slit experiment, but you can look it up on youtube. Here is what is fucking freaky about the delayed choice version. The scientists were able to rig it so the measurement happened but information about the path might have been known or unkown. (They did this with entanglement, video below) Here is the thing...If the data was scrambled, there was a wave pattern...If the data was readable, it was a particle pattern..But the patterns showed up BEFORE it could be known whether the data was readable or not, and the act of measurement itself didn't affect anything.

This violates causality no? It would somehow mean the pattern itself determined whether the data could or could not be recorded...or somehow, the recording of the data affected the pattern in the past from the entangled particle.

Am I just not getting this? Does anyone have a little more information or is more experienced or have some other good source of information?

 
Last edited:
  • 1Picard
Reactions: 1 user
A

a_skeleton_03

<Banned>
29,948
29,763
Lithose said:
So I've been doing a lot of reading on the Delayed Choice Quantum Eraser experiment...Its kind of freaking me out. Anyone got any decent layman books on the subject specifically?

Its freaking me out because I had always assumed that interaction during measurement is what collapsed wave functions. So the "observer" didn't need to actually record data, merely the act of measurement itself brought returned a wave function to a discreet particle. This made sense to me, because to measure something you need some kind of interaction, and I imagined interaction forced the 'wave' to coalesce at a certain point (I know that's not how it really works, its just how I imagined it).

But the delayed choice quantum eraser proved that's not the case. I'm not sure how familiar you guys are with the original quantum slit experiment, but you can look it up on youtube. Here is what is fucking freaky about the delayed choice version. The scientists were able to rig it so the measurement happened, but the data of the measurement would not be recorded until AFTER the quantum wave hit the wall. In half the cases, the data would be scrambled and thus no one would be able to tell what was measured (But it WAS measured), in the other half of the cases, the data would be fine to read.

Here is the thing...If the data was scrambled, there was a wave pattern...If the data was readable, it was a particle pattern...But the patterns showed up BEFORE it could be known whether the data was readable or not, and whether the data was readable did not affect how the measurement was done. So the wave pattern was measured both times...But somehow whether it was a particle or wave was determined by whether it was recorded, despite the fact that whether it was recorded happened AFTER the pattern showed up.

This violates causality no? It would somehow mean the pattern itself determined whether the data could or could not be recorded...or somehow, the recording of the data affected the pattern in the past.

Am I just not getting this? Does anyone have a little more information or is more experienced or have some other good source of information?

Click to expand...

You should watch the show Devs if you aren’t already. It’s fiction but they have a good team teaching them about quantum mechanics. It’s not about this thing you are talking about but it does mention the split beam and a bunch of other experiments. They do some neat theoretical stuff in the show.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user
pharmakos

pharmakos

soʞɐɯɹɐɥd
<Bronze Donator>
16,305
-2,233
Lithose said:
So I've been doing a lot of reading on the Delayed Choice Quantum Eraser experiment...Its kind of freaking me out. Anyone got any decent layman books on the subject specifically?

Its freaking me out because I had always assumed that interaction during measurement is what collapsed wave functions. So the "observer" didn't need to actually record data, merely the act of measurement itself brought returned a wave function to a discreet particle. This made sense to me, because to measure something you need some kind of interaction, and I imagined interaction forced the 'wave' to coalesce at a certain point (I know that's not how it really works, its just how I imagined it).

But the delayed choice quantum eraser proved that's not the case. I'm not sure how familiar you guys are with the original quantum slit experiment, but you can look it up on youtube. Here is what is fucking freaky about the delayed choice version. The scientists were able to rig it so the measurement happened but information about the path might have been known or unkown. (They did this with entanglement, video below) Here is the thing...If the data was scrambled, there was a wave pattern...If the data was readable, it was a particle pattern..But the patterns showed up BEFORE it could be known whether the data was readable or not, and the act of measurement itself didn't affect anything.

This violates causality no? It would somehow mean the pattern itself determined whether the data could or could not be recorded...or somehow, the recording of the data affected the pattern in the past from the entangled particle.

Am I just not getting this? Does anyone have a little more information or is more experienced or have some other good source of information?

Click to expand...


Wikipedia just says "If a photon in flight is interpreted as being in a so-called "superposition of states", i.e. if it is interpreted as something that has the potentiality to manifest as a particle or wave, but during its time in flight is neither, then there is no time paradox. This is the standard view, and recent experiments have supported it."

I've a lot more reading to do tho...
 
Sentagur

Sentagur

Low and to the left
<Silver Donator>
3,825
7,937
Lithose said:
So I've been doing a lot of reading on the Delayed Choice Quantum Eraser experiment...Its kind of freaking me out. Anyone got any decent layman books on the subject specifically?

Its freaking me out because I had always assumed that interaction during measurement is what collapsed wave functions. So the "observer" didn't need to actually record data, merely the act of measurement itself brought returned a wave function to a discreet particle. This made sense to me, because to measure something you need some kind of interaction, and I imagined interaction forced the 'wave' to coalesce at a certain point (I know that's not how it really works, its just how I imagined it).

But the delayed choice quantum eraser proved that's not the case. I'm not sure how familiar you guys are with the original quantum slit experiment, but you can look it up on youtube. Here is what is fucking freaky about the delayed choice version. The scientists were able to rig it so the measurement happened but information about the path might have been known or unkown. (They did this with entanglement, video below) Here is the thing...If the data was scrambled, there was a wave pattern...If the data was readable, it was a particle pattern..But the patterns showed up BEFORE it could be known whether the data was readable or not, and the act of measurement itself didn't affect anything.

This violates causality no? It would somehow mean the pattern itself determined whether the data could or could not be recorded...or somehow, the recording of the data affected the pattern in the past from the entangled particle.

Am I just not getting this? Does anyone have a little more information or is more experienced or have some other good source of information?

Click to expand...

Its because of the simulation optimization processes. The high precision rendering is reserved only for stuff being actively observed the rest is just estimated with placeholders until its observed.
Limitation to save on hardware usage, just like the speed of light and the switch that turns off the light in the fridge when the door is closed.
 
  • 2Like
Reactions: 1 users
Omi43221

Omi43221

Trakanon Raider
928
824


Skip to 39:30

Not sure what to think about it yet. He clearly has enough knowledge of math to speak the language.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.