Science!! Fucking magnets, how do they work?

  • Guest, it's time once again for the massively important and exciting FoH Asshat Tournament!



    Go here and give us your nominations!
    Who's been the biggest Asshat in the last year? Give us your worst ones!

Cad

scientia potentia est
<Bronze Donator>
25,916
51,071
The thing is, power generation isn't our problem. Enough energy falls, literally, out of the sky in a minute to power everything on earth for a day--solar power(And it's not complex, we don't even need photoelectric cells, we can just use mirrors). And storing solar isn't impossible, the same molten salt system Thorium reactors use, Solar reactors can use to store energy over night . Or hell, we can pump water up a large hill and then use hydro power, or a host of other ways to store solar energy (Like converting it to a biomass fuel). The point is, we easily have the capability right now to replace all power needs with solar, and not have night or cloud/overcast cycles affect us, except a few special cases that require potability or high mass to energy ratios (Like jets).

The problem is price though. Oil and natural gas and coal are justsignificantlycheaper. Even if Thorium is viable, if it's not cheaper than gas or oil or coal at producing Killowats per dollar? It's still useless, again because the answer is not just about the ability to produce energy. We have the ability to produce an endless amount of energy, forever. It's about producing it cheaper. And I think that's the thing, people don't realize just how amazing we are at extracting coal, oil and gas from the earth--we do it really well, and very efficiently. It's hard for other forms of energy to meet that price point.

TLDR: Its not about energy. Producing energy for everyone is trivial. The question is, can you produce it at the price of carbon?
I think burning fossil fuels has a lot of secondary costs that aren't factored into the kw/h price.
 

Tuco

I got Tuco'd!
<Gold Donor>
48,089
83,103
Ervveone is a nuclear scientist in this thread. THey read it on wikipedia.
Nobody is describing nuclear science in enough detail to need a professional background in the field.

Most of the discussion is around non-nuclear energy anyway.


Welcome back Foler.
 

Lithose

Buzzfeed Editor
25,946
113,037
I think burning fossil fuels has a lot of secondary costs that aren't factored into the kw/h price.
Yeah, spillover costs are a big area in economics. It's like the public good dilemma, it's just not something the market is good at adjusting for. That's why there have been attempts at carbon taxes, ect--to try and factor in the spill over costs into the usage to make other forms of energy viable. But with the power of the oil/coal/gas industries, this is an uphill battle at best. =-/.

Solar is not the way Taco.
Are you back from the deep web?
 

Burnem Wizfyre

Log Wizard
12,605
22,220
I RTFA but in layman's terms, what does a monopole magnet mean for consumer electronic? Does it now allow us to do some cool shit or only help support the big bang theory / physics?
Maybe but who knows, the guy who basically invented the technology for the MRI did so to look inside nebula's and that shit revolutionized modern health care.
 

Alex

Still a Music Elitist
14,723
7,544
I've never been, but I have family who have (it's in northern Kentucky). I've heard it's pretty ridiculous. Cavemen hanging out with dinosaurs and shit. Of course, my family members who went (all in the church) loved it.

rrr_img_59165.jpg
 

Tuco

I got Tuco'd!
<Gold Donor>
48,089
83,103
I've never been, but I have family who have (it's in northern Kentucky). I've heard it's pretty ridiculous. Cavemen hanging out with dinosaurs and shit. Of course, my family members who went (all in the church) loved it.

rrr_img_59165.jpg
lol @ the shit eating grin that caveman has while sitting next to literal monsters.
 

mkopec

<Gold Donor>
26,560
40,886
Haha! I cant believe how dumb some people are. Its like they are dismissing the better part of 100 yrs of science.
 

imready2go

WTF is a Raider?
<Gold Donor>
1,275
5,609
The problem is price though. Oil and natural gas and coal are justsignificantlycheaper. Even if Thorium is viable, if it's not cheaper than gas or oil or coal at producing Killowats per dollar? It's still useless, again because the answer is not just about the ability to produce energy. We have the ability to produce an endless amount of energy, forever. It's about producing it cheaper. And I think that's the thing, people don't realize just how amazing we are at extracting coal, oil and gas from the earth--we do it really well, and very efficiently. It's hard for other forms of energy to meet that price point.

TLDR: Its not about energy. Producing energy for everyone is trivial. The question is, can you produce it at the price of carbon?
DoEnergy is spending a ton of money on research to bring down the cost of solar:http://www1.eere.energy.gov/solar/sunshot/

Our agency has some peripheral connection to the initiative. Hard to say if it all will pan out, as the oil and gas industries will continue to pressure their buddies in Congress to kill that research.
 

BrutulTM

Good, bad, I'm the guy with the gun.
<Silver Donator>
14,785
2,670
Seems unlikely than any good can come of this.
Agreed. If people are willing to ignore pretty much all branches of natural science and say that the world is 6000 years old, they're not going to have any trouble ignoring Bill Nye and declaring their guy the winner no matter what is said by either of them. I don't know why Nye would bother with this.