Science!! Fucking magnets, how do they work?

  • Guest, it's time once again for the massively important and exciting FoH Asshat Tournament!



    Go here and give us your nominations!
    Who's been the biggest Asshat in the last year? Give us your worst ones!
F

Flunklesnarkin_sl

shitlord
922
3
Tuco_sl said:
I dunno about all that, but if we ever get to the point where we're dropping barn sized chunks of platinum into northeast Niger the results will be incredible. Seems like a miscalculation on a space mission is supposed to only endanger the astronauts. Changing that to roughly any 100 square mile location in the world is a huge step.
Click to expand...
Hopefully they wouldn't be dropping asteroids or chunks that would affect 100 square miles. Break it up then send it on down.


Hmm.. a huge chunk of platinum landing in your back yard. A disaster that compensates the victims family at the same time?
 
Eomer

Eomer

Trakanon Raider
5,472
272
Tuco_sl said:
Yeah but besides science there's no reason to have stuff in space atm. Mining asteroids is perhaps the first step to having a reason to keep all kinds of shit in space.
Click to expand...
It's somewhat chicken and egg, yes. But we can't even begin to comprehend what uses there might be for space based industrial production, just like pretty much every other major industrial invention in history.
 
Tuco

Tuco

I got Tuco'd!
<Gold Donor>
47,978
82,806
Eomer_sl said:
It's somewhat chicken and egg, yes. But we can't even begin to comprehend what uses there might be for space based industrial production, just like pretty much every other major industrial invention in history.
Click to expand...
agree 100%. I wish there was more government funding for this because that's one of the big roles of a modern government.
 
X

Xasten_sl

shitlord
83
0
General Antony_sl said:
Yes, they have taken to wasting taxpayer money very well haven't they.
Click to expand...
Many fields of research will only pay off after a long time. When this time horizon exceeds a certain time, say 30 or more years, the private market begins to experience distortions because investors don't want to put money into a project that will only pay off after they are dead. A huge return in 60 years is useless if you're dead.

You can argue all you want that government tends towards inefficiency, and I'll even agree with you. However, when the only two choices are government research and zero research, well, I think you can see the picture. Attitudes like this are the reason projects such as ITER, CERN, and others are chronically under funded. Private markets are becoming more and more relevant in space, and eventually NASA will have to change its mission parameters because private companies will become so good at rocketry and satellite maintenance. Until then, it absolutely is a legitimate government function to subsidize research into scientific frontiers that the free-market will not due to timeline and payoff distortions.

TLDR: If you're going to complain about wasted taxpayer dollars, at least pick a field that records investment losses. The contributions of NASA and similar veins of research to our society have been of immeasurable economic, social, and military benefit.
 
Heylel

Heylel

Trakanon Raider
3,602
430
How much do I have to donate for GA to lose his James Purefoy avatar? He doesn't deserve that shit.
 
Araysar

Loser Araysar

Chief Russia Reporter. Stock Pals CEO. Head of AI.
<Gold Donor>
81,687
163,388
Xasten_sl said:
Many fields of research will only pay off after a long time. When this time horizon exceeds a certain time, say 30 or more years, the private market begins to experience distortions because investors don't want to put money into a project that will only pay off after they are dead. A huge return in 60 years is useless if you're dead.

You can argue all you want that government tends towards inefficiency, and I'll even agree with you. However, when the only two choices are government research and zero research, well, I think you can see the picture. Attitudes like this are the reason projects such as ITER, CERN, and others are chronically under funded. Private markets are becoming more and more relevant in space, and eventually NASA will have to change its mission parameters because private companies will become so good at rocketry and satellite maintenance. Until then, it absolutely is a legitimate government function to subsidize research into scientific frontiers that the free-market will not due to timeline and payoff distortions.

TLDR: If you're going to complain about wasted taxpayer dollars, at least pick a field that records investment losses. The contributions of NASA and similar veins of research to our society have been of immeasurable economic, social, and military benefit.
Click to expand...
He knows all of this. He's just being a faggot.
 
TheBeagle

TheBeagle

JunkiesNetwork Donor
8,950
31,023
Ya the dolphin story was amazing. It makes me wonder if dolphins have passed down stories of humans from generation to generation through language and that entire populations near human habitation are almost 'domesticated' in a sense. Probably not, but I definitely consider dolphins and other Cetaceans as people.
 
Lambourne

Lambourne

Ahn'Qiraj Raider
2,958
7,051
Eomer_sl said:
The other thing to keep in mind is that the resources produced from asteroid mining is worth far, far more in orbit than it is on the ground. Hence the concept of building things in space with it. Instead of paying thousands of dollars a pound to launch a bunch of metal in to space, it might be a lot cheaper to launch mining and manufacturing drones that will produce ship components, fuel and the like in orbit from asteroids.
Click to expand...
This. Even just mining water ice and (using solar power) processing it in to hydrogen and oxygen would be very valuable. It's rocket fuel that's already in space. With this you could make your present day space probe go hundreds of miles per second instead of maybe ten. You could get to Mars or Jupiter in days instead of 10 months.

Imagine how the colonization of the Americas would have gone if there had been no coal, no metal, no animals, no plants and trees there. Imagine they had to ship the materials for every single building and road, all fuel and every last bit of food and water across the Atlantic. That's where we are at right now in space.

 
D

Dabamf_sl

shitlord
1,472
0
Here's a question I've never understood about orbits that may be rudimentary: if a satellite or other object were to exert a force against its orbit and come to a stop, would it just fall toward the earth? Ie is the velocity of an object responsible for keeping it at the same distance from earth, like a roulette ball when it is spinning on the outside of the wheel? Or is it something else?

The same applies for the moon or any orbiting body. Does the object's velocity prevent it from crashing into the object it orbits, or does the gravity interact with something else, and if so, what causes an object to float around rather than just sit there?

Sincerely,
3rd grader
 
Himeo

Himeo

Vyemm Raider
3,263
2,802
Dabamf_sl said:
Here's a question I've never understood about orbits that may be rudimentary: if a satellite or other object were to exert a force against its orbit and come to a stop, would it just fall toward the earth? Ie is the velocity of an object responsible for keeping it at the same distance from earth, like a roulette ball when it is spinning on the outside of the wheel? Or is it something else?

The same applies for the moon or any orbiting body. Does the object's velocity prevent it from crashing into the object it orbits, or does the gravity interact with something else, and if so, what causes an object to float around rather than just sit there?

Sincerely,
3rd grader
Click to expand...
rrr_img_11402.jpg


You're basically falling away from the planet, but the planet keeps pulling on you. Orbit is an endless fall.

 
Big Phoenix

Big Phoenix

Pronouns: zie/zhem/zer
<Gold Donor>
46,838
100,072
Dabamf_sl said:
Here's a question I've never understood about orbits that may be rudimentary: if a satellite or other object were to exert a force against its orbit and come to a stop, would it just fall toward the earth? Ie is the velocity of an object responsible for keeping it at the same distance from earth, like a roulette ball when it is spinning on the outside of the wheel? Or is it something else?

The same applies for the moon or any orbiting body. Does the object's velocity prevent it from crashing into the object it orbits, or does the gravity interact with something else, and if so, what causes an object to float around rather than just sit there?

Sincerely,
3rd grader
Click to expand...
Short answer, yes.
 
D

Dabamf_sl

shitlord
1,472
0
So what puts a satellite into orbit once it's in space? Does it need to fire boosters or whatever after it has reached the required altitude to start its sideways(orbital) movement? Can it go in any direction? Seems like a pretty precise thing. Too fast and it slowly gains altitude, too slow and it slowly falls to earth. Are there periodic adjustments for velocity and direction automated by the satellite? Is velocity what determines the altitude of orbit (faster is higher?) or is there another reason?
 
Lenas

Lenas

Trump's Staff
7,571
2,305
Things don't fly into space completely perpendicular to the surface. There's this new shit calledtrajectory, namean? You should read up on it.

Since a horizontally-launched projectile falls a vertical distance of 5 meters in its first second of motion, a orbiting projectile must be launched with a horizontal speed of 8000 m/s. When launched at this speed, the projectile will fall towards the Earth with a trajectory which matches the curvature of the Earth.
Click to expand...
 
Zodiac

Zodiac

Lord Nagafen Raider
1,200
14
First of all, they don't launch straight up. Normally they launch in an easterly direction. Also, they use multistage boosters to put it in the correct orbit.

As for understanding about orbits - just think of it as if you throw a ball really really hard into orbit it will keep falling but it's justmissingthe earth each time.

http://spaceplace.nasa.gov/how-orbits-work/
 
brekk

brekk

Dancing Dino Superstar
<Bronze Donator>
2,195
1,755
Geosynchronous and Geostationary orbits are gonna esplode his brain.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.