VariaVespasa_sl
shitlord
- 572
- 5
Sorry, yes, but tickets are ridiculously expensive according to my dad. He mentioned 7500 bucks a pop, although I havent confirmed that personally.I assume that's B.C.
Sorry, yes, but tickets are ridiculously expensive according to my dad. He mentioned 7500 bucks a pop, although I havent confirmed that personally.I assume that's B.C.
Not sure where you got that in the story posted. What it said was that in the distant past, we're talking billions of years ago, a rogue planet may have passed near the solar system, causing some objects to get jostled around. It didn't say that there is another large planet actually orbiting the Sun currently.Coolest part of that discovery is that they think there could be a planet 10x the size of earth affecting "Biden"'s orbit. Planet X! Lumie be summoned!
huh?Not sure where you got that in the story posted. What it said was that in the distant past, we're talking billions of years ago, a rogue planet may have passed near the solar system, causing some objects to get jostled around. It didn't say that there is another large planet actually orbiting the Sun currently.
The Solar System just got a lot more far-flung. Astronomers have discovered a probable dwarf planet that orbits the Sun far beyond Pluto, in the most distant trajectory known.
Let's take a look at Mooglak's post again:huh?
"Biden" is not a "large" planet. It's a dwarf planet maybe 450km in diameter. I'm not disputing that. I'm disputing Mooglak's supposition that there's a Planet X 10 times the size of Earth affecting Biden. That is not supported by the article posted. What the article said is this: "Another possibility is that a massive rogue planet passed through at some point, kicking objects from the Kuiper belt outwards into the inner Oort cloud." A rogue planet by definition does not orbit the Sun.Mooglak_sl said:Coolest part of that discovery is that they thinkthere could be a planet 10x the size of earth affecting "Biden"'s orbit.Planet X! Lumie be summoned!
Ah, fair enough, that article does mention it. The Nature one didn't.I edited my post, but check it out for yourself:
A new object at the edge of our Solar System discovered
That dwarf planet shit is really annoying. To me it comes off as people dont like the idea of our solar system having a few dozen planets.Scientists found what they think is a dwarf planet that orbits the sun beyond Pluto and they nick named it VP after Joe Biden.Dwarf planet stretches Solar System's edge : Nature News Comment
Dude, there's probably hundreds of dwarf planets in the Oort cloud. A line had to be drawn somewhere.That dwarf planet shit is really annoying. To me it comes off as people dont like the idea of our solar system having a few dozen planets.
And when we find a system with 20-30 Earth-Mars sized bodies? I get that there are gonna be a ton of 300-600km icey, round bodies floating around. I just think its dumb how the criteria they went with when it comes to what is what.Dude, there's probably hundreds of dwarf planets in the Oort cloud. A line had to be drawn somewhere.
Also, discovery of planets is generally very hard. I mean, the first extrasolar planet was only found in 1991. Generally speaking, the solar system has to be on the same plane as our view of it for us to detect planets around it. One method which iirc is responsible for the most planets being discovered is the Doppler method, which generally leads to Jupiter-sized planets being discovered since only planets about that size and in close proximity to a star has a sufficient tug, which, btw, we can measure as little as 40ft of "tug". We can also measure the light when a planet passes in front of a star, but this is much more difficult.(1) A "planet"1 is a celestial body that: (a) is in orbit around the Sun, (b) has sufficient mass for its self-gravity to overcome rigid body forces so that it assumes a hydrostatic equilibrium (nearly round) shape, and (c) hascleared the neighbourhoodaround its orbit.(2) A "dwarf planet" is a celestial body that: (a) is in orbit around the Sun, (b) has sufficient mass for its self-gravity to overcome rigid body forces so that it assumes a hydrostatic equilibrium (nearly round) shape2, (c) has not cleared the neighbourhood around its orbit, and (d) is not a satellite.
(3) All other objects3, except satellites, orbiting the Sun shall be referred to collectively as "Small Solar System Bodies".
It's possible that you might find a planetary system with that many large objects in it reasonably close to the star, but it's extremely unlikely they will have "cleared the neighborhood" at is would be very early in the system's evolution. Which would make them technically a dwarf planet, even though they're not small. So yeah, the definitions aren't perfect by any means, but they had to find a compromise somewhere. It's certainly better than saying that Ceres, Vesta, Charon, Eris, Makemake, Haumea, Sedna, Orcus, Salacia, Quaoar, and a bunch of numbered shit (that will eventually number in the hundreds) are all planets in the same category as Earth and Jupiter.Also, I think that based on what we know about solar system formation, you would not see 20-30 earth-sized planets in orbit around 1 star.
Then lay out your alternative classification system. To me a classification system that lumped Jupiter in with hundreds or potentially thousands of bodies that are so insignificant in our solar system's evolution is straight retarded.Big Phoenix_sl said:And when we find a system with 20-30 Earth-Mars sized bodies? I get that there are gonna be a ton of 300-600km icey, round bodies floating around. I just think its dumb how the criteria they went with when it comes to what is what.