I'm poking around, the exact details of how it works don't seem to be publicly available. Even the article has NASA saying basically "Yeah, it works, we don't want to talk about the physics."I understand what it does and all the advantages it brings but I don't get how it does it. Someone needs to make a mspaint drawing for us simple people.
So, scale this up to a phalax of gigawatt-scale fission reactors and gigantic emitters and we can go space-cowboy?I'm poking around, the exact details of how it works don't seem to be publicly available. Even the article has NASA saying basically "Yeah, it works, we don't want to talk about the physics."
They clearly don't understand it fully, they designed one to fail and it still worked.They have to be missing something, right? I mean I'd it works it works and who cares, but there has to be something going on to allow it to break a law of physics?
I think its clear by now that we don't understand all of physics as well as we think we do.They have to be missing something, right? I mean I'd it works it works and who cares, but there has to be something going on to allow it to break a law of physics?
Well, they said it's relativity based...I suppose he's exploiting some sort of relativistic loop hole in normal Newtonian physics? I can't even fathom how that would work.They have to be missing something, right? I mean I'd it works it works and who cares, but there has to be something going on to allow it to break a law of physics?
That's interesting; but I thought those "random" particle creations disappeared almost instantly? How is it possible to ionize them and use them as fuel?NASA tested the Quantum Vacuum Plasma Thruster, or Q-Thruster. It creates fluctuations in the quantum vacuum, creating particle-antiparticle pairs, which ignite into a plasma and then are pushed through the thruster like a normal plasma drive. It's not reactionless, but it doesn't require stored fuel.Quantum vacuum plasma thruster - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I wanna know why in the hell this was never put into use;
NERVA - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Nuclear rocket engine, the successor to the chemical rocket engine. Its like the next logical step from chemical rockets and we had a working prototype but just said fuck it and canceled it after seeing it worked.
Space program lost most of its funding. Never got enough back to pursue any of the really exciting projects... pretty simple really.I wanna know why in the hell this was never put into use;
NERVA - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Nuclear rocket engine, the successor to the chemical rocket engine. Its like the next logical step from chemical rockets and we had a working prototype but just said fuck it and canceled it after seeing it worked.
It still seems crazy to me. Like if that's the explanation then we've opened up a new can of worms in the physics world.That's interesting; but I thought those "random" particle creations disappeared almost instantly? How is it possible to ionize them and use them as fuel?