Service Providers (Internet, TV, Etc)

  • Guest, it's time once again for the massively important and exciting FoH Asshat Tournament!



    Go here and give us your nominations!
    Who's been the biggest Asshat in the last year? Give us your worst ones!

Palum

what Suineg set it to
26,540
41,328
FCC needs to break up all these companies into tiny little ones and skull fuck them with open markets or strict regulation on pricing.
Oh, oh, and then let them slowly form back together over the course of 2-3 decades until they're basically the same?
 

Kedwyn

Silver Squire
3,915
80
Really the answer to this is to force them to open their lines to competition just like POTS and Wireless carriers. MVNO's have made a huge impact on the wireless market and back in the day a similar things happened when AT&T was forced to allow other carriers to resell on their copper.
 

Gnomedolf

<Silver Donator>
15,796
99,179
My Comcast account page used to say that the 300gb cap is not currently being enforced. It now says 250gb.
 

Agraza

Registered Hutt
6,890
521
I need to step up my game.

j0i5cnP.png
 

Drakurii

Golden Baron of the Realm
14,858
47,938
Password Sharing is Theft and Its Killing Cable TV

Whatever you call it, it's killing the cable tv business.

It's no secret that young people like to consume entertainment they don't necessarily pay for.

But when business and tech types talk about this reality, they tend to use neutral or even flattering language: Millennials, they say, like to "swap" files and "share" subscription passwords. After all, super-earnest, bike-commuting, coffee-sipping twenty-somethings don't look like dangerous criminals. And let's face it, no business wants to alienate the work-force's largest generational cohort, with billions, if not trillions, worth of spending ahead of it.

But now some Wall Street analysts have decided to come right out and use another S word-steal-in discussing the problems facing some traditional media enterprises.

"The millennials are a generation that grew up (and will likely grow old) 'sharing' (read stealing) passwords for access to content if it continues to be ignored," wrote analysts Mike McCormack, Scott Goldman, and Tudor Mustata in a note to clients Tuesday. "We believe it is the most significant cause of the declining pay TV subscriber base."
 

Agraza

Registered Hutt
6,890
521
fucking el oh el. reminds me of buying singles vs. buying a whole cd when shit like itunes started. dude, I don't want the 8 shit songs that go with the 2 good ones and 2 OK ones. I'm not paying $15 so I can listen to 2-4 songs. same shit with cable. shit is on all the time, but I don't actually watch all the time. I watch perhaps 10 hours of programming a week. I'll pay for that, np. I don't want the other 400 channels 24/7 each 30 days. Sell me my 10 hours and fuck off.
 

Palum

what Suineg set it to
26,540
41,328
Yea but that negotiation would go exactly like the helicopter deposit scene in Clear and Present Danger.
 

lurker

Vyemm Raider
1,524
3,328
Quick question? My provider says they're giving me 100mbps. With an Ethernet cable between my router and my PC (a Sony Vaio), I can get 100 or better. Wireless I get 50 tops. Where's the bottleneck?

The internet is cable. The modem is a Motorola/Arris SB6141 and the router is an Asus RT-AC68U.
 

Deathwing

<Bronze Donator>
16,741
7,767
Check that the ethernet cable is Cat5e(or above) and you likely won't have any problems with 100mbit+. Technically, cat5 can handle 100mbit tops, but you really shouldn't use cat5 anymore. Especially if you're getting a NAS like you posted in the other thread. The other two things you posted support GbE.
 

lurker

Vyemm Raider
1,524
3,328
I get 100 with my ethernet cable but I only get 50 wirelessly. My limited knowledge in this matter tells me my computer(s) have some antiquated wifi hardware in them, or my router needs adjusting.
 

Remit_sl

shitlord
521
-1
I get 100 with my ethernet cable but I only get 50 wirelessly. My limited knowledge in this matter tells me my computer(s) have some antiquated wifi hardware in them, or my router needs adjusting.
Probably just interference. Download wifi analyzer or similar app and do a channel scan. Or just change channels on your router until you get better speeds. Also, try connecting via 5ghz if you arent already.
 

Agraza

Registered Hutt
6,890
521
there are older wi-fi protocols with different bandwidth. you have to have some wi-fi adapter in the machine somewhere. perhaps integrated, i don't know. that's where I'd look first.
 

Remit_sl

shitlord
521
-1
there are older wi-fi protocols with different bandwidth. you have to have some wi-fi adapter in the machine somewhere. perhaps integrated, i don't know. that's where I'd look first.
This is also true. Even 2.4ghz 802.11n 20mhz channel width tops out at 65 theoretical Mbps, so 50Mbps TCP in the real world is about as good as it could get (TCP traffic has more overhead, UDP would get you closer to air rate). It is unlikely that a 40mhz channel width will provide improved performance at 2.4ghz unless you are very rural. You will need a good clear channel to surpass 50Mbps TCP in 802.11n 5ghz, or move to AC.
 

Gnomedolf

<Silver Donator>
15,796
99,179
I get 85 thru my cable. I didn't get the full speed on wireless until I got a laptop with AC wireless. I get a link speed of 1.3gb with it. Awesome stuff.
 

Ritley

Karazhan Raider
15,989
34,967
Only way I get full speed from wifi at my house is on the 5 ghz band. 2.4 had too much interference in my area apparently