Poll Should Tanoomba's ban be lifted

Free the moonbat?

  • Yes

    Votes: 61 40.1%
  • No

    Votes: 91 59.9%

  • Total voters
    152
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.

Lunis

Blackwing Lair Raider
2,333
1,601
I stopped reading his posts a year ago. The best way to handle people like him is to just ignore them.
 
  • 1Solidarity
Reactions: 1 user

Oblio

Utah
<Gold Donor>
11,866
25,919
I just don't know at what point a ban is just good enough based on how much a person is disliked.

Yeah, that is the $64 Question. Bans like this make me wonder why we have an ignore feature. If someone upsets you that much & you can just remove them from your life with a click of a button, it is just that simple. All the people that complain about TNMB are the ones that enabled him, why do you guys give him so much power over you? Just click ignore.
 
  • 1Like
  • 1Salty
Reactions: 1 users

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,673
18,384
Yeah, that is the $64 Question. Bans like this make me wonder why we have an ignore feature. If someone upsets you that much you can just remove them from your life with a click of a button, it is just that simple. All the people that complain about TNMB are the ones that enabled him, why do you guys give him so much power over you? Just click ignore.

200 people shouldn't have to all ignore one person.

Fuck off with this retard logic.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,673
18,384
Its an expression.

Jesus fuck you're dense.

The majority of a population shouldn't have to put one person on ignore.

This entire conversation is retarded because you can't provide a reason for him to be unbanned, the vote count is against you, and the rules state that these decisions are final authority of the admin team.

Now go express your angst with Keg in his thread in Screenshots.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,673
18,384
If I were you Hodj I would be very concerned about popularity contests. You are the one that is dense, because you don't realize I am trying to protect you as well.

Case & point:

Poll - Who should leave: Vanessa or hodj?

Bans aren't up to a vote, and that one isn't remotely valid and is a troll because Keg is butthurt that he's been shut down on his trolling consistently for the past week plus.

Like I said, go take your salt out in that thread with Keg.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

Hoss

Make America's Team Great Again
<Gold Donor>
28,256
18,138
We don't need to wait. We don't have a rule that only after you dox someone you get banned.

I'm going to pretend that you knew the rules while you were amod and forgot them the second you were deamodded. Not a damn thing in the rules about threats. Not unless you've personally redefined doxxing to include threats.

"3.) Any real life information will be deleted if disclosed, otherwise known as "doxxing". Any doxxing will be discussed amongst the moderation team at the time and then the person may be banned. This does not mean they have to be banned, the moderation team has the discretion to handle each case separately. This is the one thing that the administration team will have final say on because they are ultimately responsible for any legal matters pertaining to this."
 
  • 2Salty
  • 2Like
Reactions: 3 users

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,673
18,384
"The moderation team has discretion to handle each case separately"

Miss that part Hoss?
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

Ameraves

New title pending...
<Bronze Donator>
13,882
15,347
How in the actual fuck is this thread still going?
 
  • 2Solidarity
Reactions: 1 users

DickTrickle

Definitely NOT Furor Planedefiler
13,742
16,104
"The moderation team has discretion to handle each case separately"

Miss that part Hoss?

But that line is not in a vacuum, it's a direct addendum to the act of real life information being disclosed (which did not happen).
 
  • 1Salty
Reactions: 1 user

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,673
18,384
But that line is not in a vacuum, it's a direct addendum to the act of real life information being disclosed (which did not happen).

The threat was deemed serious enough by the mod team.

If you have a problem with that, there will be elections in another six months.

At which point you can enter any changes to the rules you would like to see implemented, submit them to a legitimate community vote, as well as cast your vote for the mod team that you think will interpret the rules in ways favorable to your position.

Except by then no one will care anymore.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

DickTrickle

Definitely NOT Furor Planedefiler
13,742
16,104
The threat was deemed serious enough by the mod team.

If you have a problem with that, there will be elections in another six months.

At which point you can enter any changes to the rules you would like to see implemented, submit them to a legitimate community vote, as well as cast your vote for the mod team that you think will interpret the rules in ways favorable to your position.

Except by then no one will care anymore.

Submitting a rule change would be pointless if they don't have to follow it. I'm sure our resident rules nazi, @a_skeleton_03, could weigh in whether they followed the letter of rule 3. Now, you could say the spirit of the rule should include threats and I wouldn't necessarily disagree, but the letter does not. It addresses actual revealed information.
 
  • 1Salty
Reactions: 1 user
Status
Not open for further replies.