Would also like an explanation or video with subtitles for this scene. The whole movie made sense exceptCan someone who watched a version with sub-titles spoiler an explanation for me on what the conversation in Korean at the end of the movie was all about?
I bet the ending was one of the things the producer wanted to re-edit for American audiences.the ending was stupid
MiLLENiUM rip has hardcoded subs for all non-english parts
chat before the door
It is a beautiful story, Curtis.
But I do not want to open that door.
You know what I want?
I want to open another door.
But not that one.
This one.
It opens to the outside.
She was sentenced for 18 years.
Everyone thinks it is a wall.
But it's a fucking door.
Open it and get us out of here.
I know.
But maybe we can survive.
Remember the Bridge of Yekaterina?
When we massacred then with axes.
Every New Year I check something.
We see the wreckage of a plane.
Under the snow.
There for ten years.
Its tail barely visible.
But now I can see the fuselage and wings.
There is less snow and ice.
It's melting.
The snow is thining.
Not long before it all goes.
Recently,
you know what I saw?
Outside, there were...Rain drops.
I'm wasting my breath telling you this.
You don't agree with me right?
Kronol is......highly combustable.
One spark and BOOM!
Basically, it's a fucking bomb.
I don't want it just to get wasted.
But have been saving it to blow open that door.
Matches, quickly.
i didn't like terminator guy one bit, the rest of it was enjoyable.
wouldn't it have to be like -300+ to freeze like that?
Yeah, you're right, it was a great ending. ObviouslyI bet the ending was one of the things the producer wanted to re-edit for American audiences.
Yeah that totally changes the ending for me, sort of. The polar bear showing up made me think, "Oh yeah they're totally going to live.", but it's good to know that blowing up the door was intentional because he assumed they'd live.
Even still it's a pretty dumb move. If shit is thawing out just wait another ten years and everyone can get off the train. But I can accept that ending either way.
Only a little. You really have to go into suspend disbelief overload on this movieAm i doing it wrong?
Not really. Most movies boil down to needing some suspension of disbelief in some part. Every movie Ive ever watched could probably be broken down to pages of nerd rage about why x y and z were unbelievable, unlikely to happen or just stupid. Either the movie just works for you in spite of this, or it doesn't. In this case, I loved the idea, the acting was great (tilda swinton especially), and the story was intriguing enough that the stuff like who would fix the tracks became irrelevant to me. This type of stuff only really gets to me when the movie is just so poor and has nothing going for it at all that everything becomes stupid and absurd. Take a movie like Melancholia for example, which I really liked. Im sure the physics etc. made absolutely no sense, but it was more about the movie's portrayal of depression and the characters rather than the asteroid, the science is not so important.Sorry, i was not able to suspend disbelief on this one. Why a train? Who does maintenance on the tracks? Where is all the storage required for so many people? And many more questions kept me from enjoying this one. The setting really irked me, otherwise it could have been a decent but surreal sci fi movie.
I was trying to see more in it, like a metaphor on humankind on its way to ruin but then again it wasn't deep enough since it relied to much on superficial crap instead of philosophy. The whole movie felt like that scene in the Matrix where the architect is bullshitting everone and in the end you are as smart as before.
Am i doing it wrong?
don't remember if there were any shots of the whole train, but in the book it is 1,001 cars long.