Yeah. They already used it in TFA that way. It's not that subtle, but it's incredibly mild. The fight scene with Rey and Finn? Where he decides to rescue her and she kicks everyone's ass including his... and then proclaims "I don't need rescued"? (I don't remember if she literally said that, she probably did because there's a chance that SOMEONE might have missed the point, but that was the scene). That's a play against type, furthering a kind of social agenda. In this case basic equality of women. Strong woman, comically inept martial trained goofball. It's a play against their OWN type of the movie that this was a remake of, even. Leia, while she was assertive and a rejection of the tropes that proceeded HER... the entire damn plot of the first movie revolved around rescuing her. It's not subtle. It's also not offensive.
And like royal says there. Diversity of both ethnicity and sexual tendency. Of course. It's only offensive if it's the focus of the story, or interferes with the story. It's like product placement. They gotta be drinking something, so they might as well be drinking coke. It's not a problem unless it becomes a problem. Well, in Star Wars them drinking coke WOULD be a problem. But in a movie set anywhere from the 40's to 20's it wouldn't be at all.
Do they turn Star Wars into "Dear White People" or "Brokeback Mountain"? No. They do not do that. This is a business. You don't start selling thousand dollar artisinal forged period-true katanas at the grocery store and expect to make a profit.