Draegan_sl
2 Minutes Hate
- 10,034
- 3
So Vader is basically Hitler, and the clone wars should have been WWI.It was retarded to have clones for the Republic anyway...I love how the Jedi believed the other side was bad, meanwhile they are using a living sentient army, that even unlike droids can feel pain and fear. Fuck me, there are so many ways to easily say the Jedi were the evil ones.
Stories would have been better, IMO, if the Jedi used droid armies, combined with their own skill to keep the peace. A new faction shows up with clones, and a super weapon that disables droids (Any advanced AI, but leaves lower end computers functional). New faction is small, but thanks to super effective/fearless clones that are indoctrinated and can blend in and even blow themselves up when needed (Obvious correlation), the new faction is able to destabilize some systems, gets them to leave the Republic because the Republic is gridlocked and can't aid them (Make it a corollary to the U.S. senate, with the Emperor's faction shitting on every form of governance hoping to kill the system.).....Eventually to respond to threat, the Jedi begin raising an old fashioned army (Storm Troopers).
Anakin's fall should have been about him caring about his men, seeing his men constantly butchered or maimed because of political incompetence, which he blames on how the republic works (Even if it was the the Emperor.) Make it a strong parallel to a lot of modern wars where one army feels hamstrung by politics and half measures...You know, have a scene where they want to bombard a base because it's teeming with clones, but they can't get approval because the commanders believe it might have civilians, and the Senate has ordered no use of X or Y...Have Anakins friends forced to go door to door on foot and get maimed/killed. Then finally, after years of this, have Anakin snap and start using his force powers in violently destructive but highly effective ways....Then have him start going rogue and using the measures the Senate forbids. Always have a back drop of him saving lives AND being effective, make the story a logical, compelling one about how he'll save more lives if he can make it a shorter war and the injustice of being forced to fight a war in ways that are politically motivated.
Darth Vader's rise shouldn't have been concern over a vision, or petulance due to his "skills" not being recognized. It should have been motivated by the need to bring effective order to the Galaxy, that wasn't trapped in the concerns of popularity and bureaucracy. And they could have used normal soldiers to put a personal face on that, showed how it twisted him up having the power to win, and save his men, and yet having a hand tied behind his back and forced to watch as they suffered....In any case, the Jedi having clones was not just dumb on the surface, for a lot of reasons, but it was also a huge missed opportunity.
It wasn't the dark side that did it. It was pining away for that Portman pussy for years on end without any satisfaction that made him mental.Oh and the dark side of the force is the syphilis that made him crazy.
Then we'd all be monsters.It wasn't the dark side that did it. It was pining away for that Portman pussy for years on end without any satisfaction that made him mental.
She was preggers tho with his kids..It wasn't the dark side that did it. It was pining away for that Portman pussy for years on end without any satisfaction that made him mental.
No, it definitely should not. Light side teaching is essentially Buddhist philosophy. Anakin's downfall, which he was warned about throughout the prequels, always had to do with attachment. Non-attachment is a major doctrine of Buddhist belief, so this made perfect sense. He was attached to his mother and her fate, he was attached to Padme and her fate, and he was attached to his ego. With attachment, comes fear of losing whatever you are attached to. And as we know, fear leads to anger, anger leads to hate, etc. This is always how it had to be. Anakin's story is one of fear. The people he cared about, end up dying, and this frightens him. Qui-Gon, Shmi, Padme. All dead. Yoda tried teaching not to be afraid of death, but to "rejoice for those that transform into the Force." Ironically, Padme tried telling him in Attack of the Clones that she was not afraid to die. His inability to let go ultimately did him in, as he set forth to stop people from dying instead of recognizing it as a natural part of life. It made perfect sense for this to be the catalyst.Anakin's fall should have been about him caring about his men, seeing his men constantly butchered or maimed because of political incompetence, which he blames on how the republic works (Even if it was the the Emperor.)
Someone shoulda just chopped off this kid's head, Yoda sensed grave danger in his training, fuck that. OVERRULED, Qui-Gon. Go settle some trade disputes in the outer rim for a while, we'll call if we need your dumb ass. And don't bring any more "chosen ones" back here newb.No, it definitely should not. Light side teaching is essentially Buddhist philosophy. Anakin's downfall, which he was warned about throughout the prequels, always had to do with attachment. Non-attachment is a major doctrine of Buddhist belief, so this made perfect sense. He was attached to his mother and her fate, he was attached to Padme and her fate, and he was attached to his ego. With attachment, comes fear of losing whatever you are attached to. And as we know, fear leads to anger, anger leads to hate, etc. This is always how it had to be. Anakin's story is one of fear. The people he cared about, end up dying, and this frightens him. Qui-Gon, Shmi, Padme. All dead. Yoda tried teaching not to be afraid of death, but to "rejoice for those that transform into the Force." Ironically, Padme tried telling him in Attack of the Clones that she was not afraid to die. His inability to let go ultimately did him in, as he set forth to stop people from dying instead of recognizing it as a natural part of life. It made perfect sense for this to be the catalyst.
Oh I was talking about making a good movie, Edge. Not your useless Eastern Philosophy degree.No, it definitely should not. Light side teaching is essentially Buddhist philosophy. Anakin's downfall, which he was warned about throughout the prequels, always had to do with attachment. Non-attachment is a major doctrine of Buddhist belief, so this made perfect sense. He was attached to his mother and her fate, he was attached to Padme and her fate, and he was attached to his ego. With attachment, comes fear of losing whatever you are attached to. And as we know, fear leads to anger, anger leads to hate, etc. This is always how it had to be. Anakin's story is one of fear. The people he cared about, end up dying, and this frightens him. Qui-Gon, Shmi, Padme. All dead. Yoda tried teaching not to be afraid of death, but to "rejoice for those that transform into the Force." Ironically, Padme tried telling him in Attack of the Clones that she was not afraid to die. His inability to let go ultimately did him in, as he set forth to stop people from dying instead of recognizing it as a natural part of life. It made perfect sense for this to be the catalyst.
Nice.Oh I was talking about making a good movie, Edge. Not your useless Eastern Philosophy degree.
You can make that into a good movie, you just have to have a good movie maker write/direct it. That is something that Lucas was on his way to being before Star Wars ruined him. He should sold the movies a long time, after he ewok-sold out.Oh I was talking about making a good movie, Edge. Not your useless Eastern Philosophy degree.
That would've been a waaaaay better turn for Anakin than the shit Lucas wrote for sure. Granted that's not saying much. But it would've laid the groundwork better than some dumb shit about Darth Plageuis having some sith juju that would've saved Padme.Anakin's fall should have been about him caring about his men, seeing his men constantly butchered or maimed because of political incompetence, which he blames on how the republic works (Even if it was the the Emperor.) Make it a strong parallel to a lot of modern wars where one army feels hamstrung by politics and half measures...You know, have a scene where they want to bombard a base because it's teeming with clones, but they can't get approval because the commanders believe it might have civilians, and the Senate has ordered no use of X or Y...Have Anakins friends forced to go door to door on foot and get maimed/killed.
Kind of sad and somewhat racist, but at least you have some awareness it didn't seem right. Also validates complaints from minorities and sjws about not feeling represented. It's okay to not include certain types of people until a white dude can't "relate". Every group in power and dominance fights against giving up some of it even if that step actually does create more equality and representation.Meh, I'd be lying if it doesn't bother me a bit. I'm not sure why exactly it bothers me, but it does. Whether it's latent racism or the fact that it doesn't reflect my nostalgic views of Star Wars, I'm not sure-- but I would have even preferred a hot female jedi protagonist over this guy. I don't know whether it's the fact that he's black, or a relatively nobody actor, or just that he's just kinda ugly-- but he's not what I envisioned the Light Side jedi protagonist to be.
What sets them off is the fact that characters like Luke and Han were heroes in a great many young imaginations 35 years ago. Probably even in their own. The thought of young white kids of today having such a prominent hero played by a black guy or god forbid pretending to be the black guy when they're mock saber fighting with friends in the back yard, that's just more than they can bear.
It was Han and Leia's twin kids. Luke only had 1 kid.Brother vs Sister, but wasn't it Luke's kids? I never read the EU, so meh.