is this just edgelord or is that true?She wrote 0.22% of the code but gave 100% of the TED talks.
- 2
- 1
is this just edgelord or is that true?She wrote 0.22% of the code but gave 100% of the TED talks.
is this just edgelord or is that true?
She and her team came up with how to combine several theories on using some techniques to get the image (Chael also helped with that, though in a minor way), but it was Chael and many others (not including those who did all the work on the other algorithms that were combined) who actually got the final algorithm to work. So yea, she is getting WAY too much credit for the end result.There I salted you. What do you think now?
She contrib'd less than a half of 1 percent of the codebase:
View attachment 203135
Even other female members of her team are kinda miffed that the SJW media is propping up the whitest female on the team hahah
LOL 4chan's on it... shit's gonna go nuclear
Still the most impressive shit to happen in the last two decades, imo. Nice to see a private business doing this and avoiding all the political pork that has ruined so much.And in more actual Astronomy related stuff (ie space), Falcon heavy launch is successful, all three boosters recovered.
SpaceX launches Falcon Heavy into space
Writing correct code isnt science. It's difficult and time consuming and impressive when done right but it is not science.She and her team came up with how to combine several theories on using some techniques to get the image (Chael also helped with that, though in a minor way), but it was Chael and many others (not including those who did all the work on the other algorithms that were combined) who actually got the final algorithm to work. So yea, she is getting WAY too much credit for the end result.
She and her team came up with how to combine several theories on using some techniques to get the image (Chael also helped with that, though in a minor way), but it was Chael and many others (not including those who did all the work on the other algorithms that were combined) who actually got the final algorithm to work. So yea, she is getting WAY too much credit for the end result.
The worst part is she probably DID deserve the praise....but the SJW cuckmedia decided to lionize her as a Joan of Arc for women in STEM.Can't even trust the media for accurate science and tech news, I'm actually really pissed about that now. I was simply assuming she was one of those rare super smart nerdy chicks, and actually deserved the praise.
Can't even trust the media for accurate science and tech news, I'm actually really pissed about that now. I was simply assuming she was one of those rare super smart nerdy chicks, and actually deserved the praise.
The science you're talking about would never have been implemented in a way to do what it theorized it could do without the code. Aside from that, I am not trying to say she doesn't deserve credit for what she and her team did, rather I disagree with the amount of credit she alone is getting considering the number of other people involved in the theory and implementation. Hm, if coding isn't science, is math? I mean, coming up with a formula to describe something abstract is difficult, time consuming and super impressive when done right, right? ;pWriting correct code isnt science. It's difficult and time consuming and impressive when done right but it is not science.