Really it makes great sense and I hadn't thought of it before.just saw this post. wow, that's terrifying. sounds like an initial generation full of sociopaths.
Yeah, he's helming an agency spending billions ordering space capsules, while Musk is on a trajectory to be crusing around in starships.
NASA announced Monday it will order at least six reusable Orion crew capsules from Lockheed Martin for $4.6 billion to fly astronauts to the vicinity of the moon in the 2020s, and the agency said it plans to purchase hardware for up to 12 Orion vehicles by 2030.
just saw this post. wow, that's terrifying. sounds like an initial generation full of sociopaths.
Don't fucking tell Tuco. He'll lose his bubble shit.
There is a fundamental difference between a force that prevents an infinite number of different hypothetical species from coming into existence , vs a force that drives an actual species to extinction. The former affects hypothetical species. The latter affects actual speciesThat's because you tend to think of the filter as something ahead. Each filter ends more stuff than a civilization; the first ends entire worlds. It's just hard to think about it because we obviously have passed it.
My personal two "old" filter candidates:
- Complex life. Life arose fast, chemistry tend to create biological components with ease, and we have no less than three different orders of life (some parts of which use RNA instead of DNA) that tend to suggest that life might be easy. By comparison, there's mounting evidence, genetic and otherwise, that the procaryote->eucaryote jump occurred exactly ONCE in our history. Now, maybe it did occur multiple times, and some latecomers got outcompeted because eucaryote evolve scare fast. Or maybe it couldn't, and we got lucky to get complex cells, and the rest of the Galaxy is covered in bacterial mats.
- Intelligence. Khorum alluded at extinctions, but even without extinctions, there's lots of evidence that evolution is not teological (goal-driven), and that intelligence is not an ecological niche that a species has to fill. Meaning that sapients are maybe the conjunction of a significant number of random factors (we have a number of pre-sapient species around, primates, corvids and possibly cetaceans, but they all lack stuff, even if we didn't outcompete them - except probably primates). So we might be the lucky ones to get high tool-making intelligence. After all, our most significant evolutionary advantage isn't that we're intelligent, it's that we're the Terminators of the natural kingdoms. When any other creature ends up panting after running for an hour, we keep coming after them. When they can no longer run because their body heat is above all limits... we still run to them. And kill them. And eat them.
Well some ancient civilization seriously fucked up.
There is a fundamental difference between a force that prevents an infinite number of different hypothetical species from coming into existence , vs a force that drives an actual species to extinction. The former affects hypothetical species. The latter affects actual species
It's a semantic distinction that deserves recognition.
He's also getting punched in the nuts by the Senate Committee which is cutting his funding for the Moon 2024 because he doesn't want to spend it on the doomed and wasted SLS, and the senators want to teach him who really orders NASA around.Yeah, he's helming an agency spending billions ordering space capsules, while Musk is on a trajectory to be crusing around in starships.
Solar Neutrinos are nice.Liked this Twitter thread from Katie Mack.
Yes, but in the context of the Drake Equation, the accepted meaning of the term Great Filter is "all the things that drastically cut down on potential galaxy-visible civilizations". If you want to refer specifically to "the last Great Filter we are potentially facing", then you probably need a different term.There is a fundamental difference between a force that prevents an infinite number of different hypothetical species from coming into existence , vs a force that drives an actual species to extinction. The former affects hypothetical species. The latter affects actual species
It's a semantic distinction that deserves recognition.