- 14,671
- 2,529
I'm very rural so I'm very aware of this situation. They take the government money but still use it in the least rural places that they can possibly get away with because they still make more money there than they would on those of us that are really out in the sticks. I get it. You can run a mile of cable in some "rural" places and get 100 new customers. Here you run 10 miles and get 6. Still sucks for us hillbillies. I was told that we are scheduled for a fiber optic cable through the neighborhood from the local telephone coop in 2024. I imagine we will have had Starlink for at least a couple years by then so even if they run a cable to my house it's not a sure thing I'll subscribe. Right now they charge by the gigabyte and people who stream a lot of HD are paying $200 or even $300 a month for their internet which still makes Starlink sound superior.Generally a lot of internet companies over the world are complaining in this way about SpaceX, more or less.
The US has been trying to encourage internet companies to provide service to rural areas by providing money for some time. Generally it seems the companies take some money in exchange for promising an 'improvement' in rural internet access but generally provide very poor support or none. But with SpaceX going for that money, they now complain using any number of frivolous arguments. It's kind of appalling. I'm glad I'm not rural.
- 2