All true, but it's interesting to see how much has been done in even 6 years and what will another 20 bring if we don't blow ourselves up? I'm skeptical of spaceports, but a lunar colony and even a mars colony are not out of the question. A lot depends on robotics and AI at this point, which is booming. I'm ok pushing the capitalist message if it gets us further out in space.Rare Earth elements aren't actually particularly rare and can be found in the US, it's just that they're expensive to actually seperate (and would be more so on the moon).
He3 for fusion reactors is not needed until we (some day) actually invent fusion reactors. That's been something like 30 years in the future for the last sixty years, so don't hold your breath.
How much water and how easy it is to mine on the moon, I don't know that one.
Another one bites the dust.Sad to do this but Mudcrush you are going on ignore. All you do is neg shit without any feedback or reason.
I don't really care either way but since you offer nothing in exchange for your retardation, I thought I would tell you why before I never see your shit again.
The amount of energy needed to get to such a velocity is higher than you think.Also don't forget that path lengths contract at high tau, so you can make a 1000 light year journey in less than 1000 years shiptime. It also makes big distances not take much more time than fairly close distances as long as you can continue accelerating to the halfway point.
Alot of very big technical hurdles to get over to do that though. Like hitting a rock at that speed is like tsar bomba.
That movie Passengers ( newer one ) had the most convincing shield system I've seen yet. It even fails on larger things obviously but for space dust and smaller rocks, I think it could be doneAlso don't forget that path lengths contract at high tau, so you can make a 1000 light year journey in less than 1000 years shiptime. It also makes big distances not take much more time than fairly close distances as long as you can continue accelerating to the halfway point.
Alot of very big technical hurdles to get over to do that though. Like hitting a rock at that speed is like tsar bomba.
Man that movie rustled my jimmies. It had the chance to be good with a nice little twist at the end but nope, dumbass happy ending.That movie Passengers ( newer one )
I still bought it on sale for $5 for 4k version.Man that movie rustled my jimmies. It had the chance to be good with a nice little twist at the end but nope, dumbass happy ending.
Plus, as diverse as our minerals are, I still feel there is all sorts of shit we don't exists. When Earth was forming up, many elements may have been so heavy or light to have been deep in the core for example. Much of the shit we have now like gold mostly came from after the fact or by plate movement forcing it up and then back down mountains due to weight and water. Some unobtanium would be a good reason to really kickstart space mining and then I could get on my rusty space freighter and never have to give a shit about this planet again. Just smoking cigars, listening to shitty music and eating crappy food hoping some TransXenoAlien boards me.The biggest problem with rare earth metals is you have to process a lot of material just to get a tiny bit of the REM and it is very polluting/toxic. If you could process them on the moon, people wont give a shit about pollution (initially anyways).
Bringing water into space from Earth is inefficient. If you can get it on site on the moon, then it not only makes habitation possible but also drastically reduces the costs of further deep space launches in theory.
Bringing it from Earth, or mining it in space, it depends on cheap access to space to really make it efficient. Fortunately SpaceX is making serious progress at this.The biggest problem with rare earth metals is you have to process a lot of material just to get a tiny bit of the REM and it is very polluting/toxic. If you could process them on the moon, people wont give a shit about pollution (initially anyways).
Bringing water into space from Earth is inefficient. If you can get it on site on the moon, then it not only makes habitation possible but also drastically reduces the costs of further deep space launches in theory.
I want my space elevator.Bringing it from Earth, or mining it in space, it depends on cheap access to space to really make it efficient.
I'm not really up to date with fusion and fission, but isn't fusion not that effective ? I remember reading somewhere that the inner core of the sun, where the pressure and temperature is high enough for the fusion to take place, only produce something like 300 w per cubic meter.Rare Earth elements aren't actually particularly rare and can be found in the US, it's just that they're expensive to actually seperate (and would be more so on the moon).
He3 for fusion reactors is not needed until we (some day) actually invent fusion reactors. That's been something like 30 years in the future for the last sixty years, so don't hold your breath.
How much water and how easy it is to mine on the moon, I don't know that one.