The Astronomy Thread

  • Guest, it's time once again for the massively important and exciting FoH Asshat Tournament!



    Go here and give us your nominations!
    Who's been the biggest Asshat in the last year? Give us your worst ones!

Loser Araysar

Chief Russia Reporter. Stock Pals CEO. Head of AI.
<Gold Donor>
80,196
160,456
Stupid question: what's the risk in contaminating that water? Are we afraid we'll unleash life on Mars that will evolve and take us over? Or are we afraid we'll corrupt potential testing areas?
contamination of testing areas with earth life
 

iannis

Musty Nester
31,351
17,656
Yeah, I would think that if the goal is to look for native life or the evidence of native life then contamination of the specimen is something that you want to avoid. Who knows what would happen. Not that you're gonna create super mutant mars bacteria, but more like earth bacteria might nom the remnants that you're looking for so you won't be able to find it. Or you'll find the earth bacteria and go "HOLY SHIT, ITS THE SAME BAC... oh, wait." and then just look like an idiot.

If the idea is to go and mine for minerals then who gives a shit.

So the idea is probably the first one.
 

chthonic-anemos

bitchute.com/video/EvyOjOORbg5l/
8,606
27,290
rrr_img_53606.jpg
 

Lenardo

Vyemm Raider
3,618
2,523
nice scope

REALLY bad spot to use it though look at those shadows WAY to much background light, so your eyes would never get adjusted to the dark

street lights, a lighted sign right across the way etc,

not to say they won't see anything, that spot would be fine for a planet or the moon but nebula's etc would be very washed out.
 

Cybsled

Naxxramas 1.0 Raider
17,092
13,620
Yeah, I would think that if the goal is to look for native life or the evidence of native life then contamination of the specimen is something that you want to avoid. Who knows what would happen. Not that you're gonna create super mutant mars bacteria, but more like earth bacteria might nom the remnants that you're looking for so you won't be able to find it. Or you'll find the earth bacteria and go "HOLY SHIT, ITS THE SAME BAC... oh, wait." and then just look like an idiot.

If the idea is to go and mine for minerals then who gives a shit.

So the idea is probably the first one.
Right, the #1 issue would be proving that the life you found is not from Earth. Obviously this would be a non-issue if you found some multi-cellular life, but with bacteria it becomes more complex.

Of course, on the flipside of this, it is possible that life in the solar system has been spread around...for instance, life may have started on Mars and got spread to Earth due to meteoric bombardments and the ejection of life bearing materials. Or some people have theorized that large meteoric bombardments of Earth in the past may have spread life around to places like Europa.
 

meStevo

I think your wife's a bigfoot gus.
<Silver Donator>
6,493
4,773
Hard to say atm because they're still trying to figure out how big the CME from it is. Biggest sunspot in years and quite a large flare, so could be a couple days of wild speculation based on the data they're able to get together in the next few hours.

Or it'll just be brighter northern lights, some diverted polar flights due to radiation, and not much else.
 

iannis

Musty Nester
31,351
17,656
I heard it on NPR too. They were saying that regionally it's going to cause colder winters in the coming years for europe because science and reasons and high altitude winds and weather and things.

The person they were interviewing was also pretty cool. She said (in gentler words) about suncycles, "Look. We don't know why it does this. We don't have any fucking idea. That's why this is neat." About the regional effects on climate that's basically just a "less energy in = less energy in" equation.
 

iannis

Musty Nester
31,351
17,656
The Ramans require one black french athlete with a joan of arc fetish and one british maths professor unhealthily obsessed with shakespeare.