NASA engineers watching those videos be like...That shit never gets old.
Watching that shit really shows you that hiring people because their IQ is above 150 is more important than their skin color or orientation.As my cousin who works on flight simulation has put it, landing these boosters "Is like trying to balance a burning pencil on the tip of your finger... in a hurricane." Fucking amazing that it works at all.
Want a real dose of clown world? NASA had working prototypes of this tech back in the mid 90s;NASA engineers watching those videos be like...
Want a real dose of clown world? NASA had working prototypes of this tech back in the mid 90s;
McDonnell Douglas DC-X - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Want a real dose of clown world? NASA had working prototypes of this tech back in the mid 90s;
McDonnell Douglas DC-X - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Of course the illumined galaxy brains that run NASA canceled it in favor of a retarded design that would never fly in any form.
Lol at jet engines for touchdown.Because the way physics works, rockets actually get more efficient the larger they get. There was a serious proposal for a reusable SSTO craft in the 70s that was basically a giant cone 96 feet across that could lift 50 tons to orbit and return to land vertically using aerodynamic drag and jet engines for touchdown. It would be unmanned or optionally have a detachable, shuttle-like crew module on top. It'd be similar in total mass to the Saturn V.
It'd have been huge but SpaceX Starship is going to be almost twice as heavy.
View attachment 441141
Good thing they canceled it and dumped a billion dollars into the X-32 which never even produced a prototype at all.It was a single stage to orbit craft. It is barely possible (in theory) to build such a thing, but the payload is miniscule. Cancelling it was a good idea. The prototype was one third scale and completely unable to reach orbit. It did verify that you could build it and it would lift off and not explode.
Maybe we'd have a pitifully low payload to LEO SSTO spacecraft. I kinda doubt it, though. Probably we'd have another 20billion boondoggle like the SLS.Good thing they canceled it and dumped a billion dollars into the X-32 which never even produced a prototype at all.
Where would we be today if that had gotten a billion dollars of funding in the mid 90s instead?
Yes. Some day they'll build an orbital rocket. Some day.Didn’t a chunk of engineers from that project go to Blue Origin?
Yeah dumping resources into a concept thats proven to be the future of spaceflight 30 years ago would have been a totally bad choice over the concept that never made it to the prototype stage.Maybe we'd have a pitifully low payload to LEO SSTO spacecraft. I kinda doubt it, though. Probably we'd have another 20billion boondoggle like the SLS.
Might have caused SpaceX not to exist which certainly would not be a plus.