I enjoyed it. Just a regular/non-famous guy who's had a pretty interesting life.Is this Jonas one worth listening? Seems like a good topic
I normally love when Joe has survival/hunting types on. For some reason, I found this dude somewhat boring and his constant, "huh huh huh" laughter started to get on my nerves. Only made it about an hour and a half.Is this Jonas one worth listening? Seems like a good topic
Jordan Jonas spent 77 days living alone in the Canadian wilderness to become the winner for the sixth season of the History Channel’s reality television show “Alone.” @Jordan Jonas
That shit burns me up. Worst part is the conspiracy portion of my brain wants to say he was targeted. Regardless it's terrible.They burned down Eddie's gym.
I watch their show daily. Their honesty is so refreshing, they even admit early in this show they get it wrong sometimes.53 minutes into this right now and I found it really interesting.
I watch their show daily. Their honesty is so refreshing, they even admit early in this show they get it wrong sometimes.
The Hill
The Hill is the premier source for policy and political news. Follow for tweets on what's happening in Washington, breaking news and retweets of our reporters.www.youtube.com
The chick is annoying me. No real answers or solutions for immediate problems, just fee-fees and extremely broad hypothetical solutions that have been tried, and been proven time and time again to not work, and no actual ground level experience in dealing with the shitters of society on a regular basis.
"We should just de-escalate," "Trump said maybe army," "The police used it 3/5 more on blacks," "Trump with his fragile masculinity has no plan" "We need UBI, a massive federal jobs program, and universal healthcare..."
Okay, how?
/JohnTravoltaLookingAroundMeme
Yeah, they talk about their interactions a lot, even in the Rogan episode. Their discourse starts with listening to the other person, some thing you never ever see in media or politics, which I think has a lot to do with it. If you have to limit yourself to responding to what a person actually says or believes rather than some strawman or some theoretical thing, it changes the interaction from a contest that a person is trying to win into a dialogue. But even they fuck that up a lot, limited time segments and stuff dictate how conversations will happen.I think the main point of the show is differing views with civil discourse, which is something we need more of.
I agree, they need to break away from your typical cable news format. Long form conversation like they had with Joe yesterday was way better. It is just hard to cover daily topics that way though, people want news and they want it now. People are are too busy or too lazy or to indifferent to invest that kind of time though, so for the short term until their popularity grows they are stuck in this format.Yeah, they talk about their interactions a lot, even in the Rogan episode. Their discourse starts with listening to the other person, some thing you never ever see in media or politics, which I think has a lot to do with it. If you have to limit yourself to responding to what a person actually says or believes rather than some strawman or some theoretical thing, it changes the interaction from a contest that a person is trying to win into a dialogue. But even they fuck that up a lot, limited time segments and stuff dictate how conversations will happen.