I don't know how effective it is, Not an expert on Chinese greenhouse emissions. I read that they are now projected to beat their planned deadline for 2030 for stopping growth of greenhouse emissions, which they are tying to the market shit. Which seems like way too little too late, but that wasn't her point I dont think, more just that there's this to in the toolbox to deal with it and us, the bastion of western capitalism, can't seem to do anything with it even if our competitors are.
The most interesting points she made had nothing to do with climate change, i think. Fuckin radium.
I'm not an expert in China either, I just know that they account for the bulk of world air pollution. So if they've got a program in place to limit it I hate to think of how bad it would be if it were an effective strategy. Somehow I think it's a tax that no one is paying. Which does not invalidate her observation and might have been kind of her point in a way. The Chinese are at least willing to pay lip service to this idea, America isn't even willing to pay it lip service. A journey of a thousand miles and all.
Yeah, that part was great. People tend to overlook that human testing isn't rare in the medical field. We very much agree to not talk about it. And of -course- it's still going on today. This 23andme shit is nothing but that. Back in the 90's when they were harvesting ovum is a little more exact. I can't see how 23andme is immedately harmful in the way radium was. But what do I know, i'm time bounded. It might be that the research 23andme serves ends up producing the worst eugenics program our race has ever suffered. And it might not. It's not exact but it's in the same area.
Heroin is called Heroin because when it was first produced they suspected it might be a wonder drug. Well, shit, they weren't exactly wrong. Just not exactly right, either.
Joe himself has been shot up with stem cells down mexico way... Maybe that's not radium, but it's the exact same thing. Radium is so captivating because it was such an obviously bad idea even at the time. Thalidamide babies, she could have talked about that one too. This is a problem that's getting worse instead of better, and a lot of it is driven by profit and the dreaded BIGPHARMA. They'll look back at all of our dick and brainpills in 3 generations the way we look back on radium.
For all that though, it usually goes better than worse. It's easy to be too critical. There are abuses, but that does not mean they are all abuses. There are tradgedies, but the bulk of the time it works out beneficially. My uncle has a friend that underwent an experimental treatment for pancreatic cancer. Seriously even the doctor was like "I'm pretty sure this is legal, but if you die don't sue me ok?" 8 years later, he's still alive.