lol so many things I want to say, that have already been said in one form or another by all of you. But I like smelling my own farts so fuck it:
Yeah, this short story is one of his best. Shawshank was such a great movie because (1) the acting and direction were top notch and (2) the movie was practically word for word the short story. Running Man is a perfect microcosm of the 1980's, and enjoyable for the schlock we love(d), but objectively it was a terrible movie and so far from the source story that it essentially only shared the title and character names. A modern, dark movie take on the ACTUAL story of one (innocent? he was innocent, right?) man against the dystopian society would be fantastic.
And then there was The Langoliers. Someone posted a pic from it not long ago.
But the theme of the story as I interpreted it was something like "careful what you wish for, you might get it" and the regrets of the sacrifices to get it kind of thing - the ending was pretty depressing. It could also be something like an overall representation of life - you have to fight and struggle and sacrifice through your life, and when you finally reach your objective in the end (retirement?) you wonder if it was at all worth it. And you can never stop along the journey or your life is fucked.
That was terrible, but I hope at least somewhat understandable.
You can't make this movie a spectacle, it has to be a slower burn. Act 1 is the story and background of the main character - starts drab but slowly gets optimistic. Act 2 is the hype leading up to, and the start of, the race. Includes flashbacks of other races, glimpses into the life of former winners - mood gets exciting and colorful and positive - more reference to winners and little reference to the consequence of not winning. Act 3 is the race itself - starts positive and degrades rapidly all the way to the depressing ending. The race is only a third of the movie as it has to be harsh and brutal.