- 8,388
- 10,452
Ah no. The whole area was basically necropolis land - the Pharaoh built their pyramids there because the terrain wasn't good for anything.First, thank you. So back then, there was grass and shit around the pyramids right? It wasn’t like Stargate where it’s just desert? Did the Romans hide/destroy a lot of what Egypt had built after they conquered them? What made Rome want to get rid of them?
Egypt has always been pretty much: near-Nile = floods = extremely fertile cropland / not-Nile = arid shit. The mere presence of the Nile meant you could grow crops. You dug out the banks so that the flood extended much further, and you gained more arable land. The Romans pretty much took over, said "stop bothering with your shitty craftsmanship, we need food".
Caesar didn't stop at invading Gaul, he made a good stab at invading Britain, but didn't go very far. The Emperors after him pushed slowly upward almost to "Scotland" before logistics and unruly pictish tribes pushed them back in the 2nd century AD, then they had their internal problems (like, an empire starting to collapse) and evacuated their troops in the 5th century AD, leaving the locals pretty much alone.I remember going to Bath in England and there was huge Ronan city with the underground bath houses etc. Had never thought about how Rome invaded there.
If you are interested specifically in Roman History, a general introduction that I find good would be Mary Beard's SPQR:What’s a good book/resource to break all this down?
SPQR: A History of Ancient Rome
In SPQR, an instant classic, Mary Beard narrates the hi…
www.goodreads.com
If you want a more general ancient history, then I can suggest Robert's History of the World:
- 2