Lumi
Vyemm Raider
- 4,310
- 3,041
Are you?...because the fact that you think it shows abiogenesis is possible tells me you know fuck all about it.Are you familiar with the experiment?
- 1
Are you?...because the fact that you think it shows abiogenesis is possible tells me you know fuck all about it.Are you familiar with the experiment?
Are you?...because the fact that you think it shows abiogenesis is possible tells me you know fuck all about it.
All it did was show that some building blocks of living organisms can form in what is assumed to have been early earthlike conditions. It's quite literally like saying that because you have bricks, those bricks can then somehow magically turn themself into a house on their own.Can you please explain the problem you have with the experiment?
It's quite literally like saying that because you have garlic cloves, those garlic cloves can then somehow magically turn themself into fettuccini Alfredo on their own.
All it did was show that some building blocks of living organisms can form in what is assumed to have been early earthlike conditions. It's quite literally like saying that because you have bricks, those bricks can then somehow magically turn themself into a house on their own.
In this analogy, a human being is a house?
All it did was show that some building blocks of living organisms can form in what is assumed to have been early earthlike conditions. It's quite literally like saying that because you have bricks, those bricks can then somehow magically turn themself into a house on their own.
You're right, it's a bad analogy. A human being is unimaginably more complex than a house and therefore immensely more unlikely to form through any sort of naturalistic process.In this analogy, a human being is a house?
I agree. So why do you picard my other post...lol?Yeah I agree, entities don't just form out of nothing.
There is an updated summary I found last evening. Let me find it for ya.Found my way in here again after a very long hiatus. I dabbled in this field for about 5 years in the mid 2000s before realising it was an interesting, but ultimate dead end field - at least at the time. In the end I took up a position influenced by a mix of Jacques Valleé and Rick Strassmann (of the Spirit Molecule) that UFOs and Aliens were most likely real in some form, but were more likely to be interdimensional beings rather than biological entities that originated from another solar system and travelled here via space travel. Though I did not rule anything out.
I checked out the past few pages and it seems things are pretty much where I left them off some 15 years ago, with the exception of some hot, young latina congresswomen. One group believing that revelation is just around the corner, others debunking them, yet others finding newer and stranger tales to tell, and the Government still sitting on the fence saying "yes, we're looking into it, but no, they don't exist, but here is a document so heavily redacted that you can use it to "prove" anything you want."
Am I far off, or not? Is there a good summery of UFO research of the past, say, 3-5 years available somewhere?
You're right, it's a bad analogy. A human being is unimaginably more complex than a house and therefore immensely more unlikely to form through any sort of naturalistic process.
Because you are objecting to organic life coming together through some non intelligent process, but are totally fine with God coming together the same way.I agree. So why do you picard my other post...lol?
God didn't come together though? God has always existed. Organic life did not. Big difference.Because you are objecting to organic life coming together through some non intelligent process, but are totally fine with God coming together the same way.