This video and the one I posted makes me very sad b/c it not my lifetime i'll be able to travel to the star's or for that matter into space maybe space x or virgin galactic but real travel beyond the moon planet to planet. Oh well, all I can do is enjoy the visual's.Animation of 400,000 galaxies in their actual positions.
I appreciate your patronization. Honestly. Its more than most have given me here.Grimsark, you remind me of the story that Carl Sagan tells in his book,The Demon Haunted World, about William F. Buckley (notthatWilliam F. Buckley). You're interested in science. You want to know. But you've been led down the garden path.
But then, in order to accept the generally accepted definition of an electron, I would (by default) seem to be endorsing the entirety of the standard model of particle physics... Which itself, is more precisely based on other rarely spoken about assumptions... Quickly digressing into a pool of pseudo science under the banner of 'fact'.An electron has no known components or substructure. It is generally thought to be an elementary particle.
That's 100% how I feel. I wish I was born 100 or 200 years from now. Reminds me of this:This video and the one I posted makes me very sad b/c it not my lifetime i'll be able to travel to the star's or for that matter into space maybe space x or virgin galactic but real travel beyond the moon planet to planet. Oh well, all I can do is enjoy the visual's.
Hour+ long video... Worth watching if you have any objectivity what so ever.
Question everything!!!
huh....let me understand you....are you saying that since our knowledge of physic is not absolute, we have to live with the absuntion we dont know anything ? and that ppl like Einstein, who's idea have revolutioned our understanding of the cosmos, arent worthy of their fame?I appreciate your patronization. Honestly. Its more than most have given me here.
...
If I had to define the primary difference between me and most of the 'scientifically minded' it would be simply that I do not pretend to understand anything I am not personally certain of. A good example is electronics (which I am somewhat familiar with). I understand that certain effects have certain causes, and we have theories that can predict those causes and effects, on electrons, so precise that we are able to build integrated circuits so small that the interaction between the electrons and individual atoms becomes the primary limitation of performance... But, perhaps ironically, I do not pretend to understand what an electron is, past what we are able to actually observe. And I speak about them minus the absolutism so freely expressed by others. If that means that I am mislead (aka: walking the garden path) then so be it.
To quote wiki:
But then, in order to accept the generally accepted definition of an electron, I would (by default) seem to be endorsing the entirety of the standard model of particle physics... Which itself, is more precisely based on other rarely spoken about assumptions... Quickly digressing into a pool of pseudo science under the banner of 'fact'.
So, I will gladly walk in my own garden, than be TOLD in which garden to walk. (edit: then!than)
And I will continue to question, everything.
BTW: I love the 'man' that was Einstein... But not the 'demigod' the scientific establishment has turned him into.
What good does it do you to question what you don't know?I appreciate your patronization. Honestly. Its more than most have given me here.
...
If I had to define the primary difference between me and most of the 'scientifically minded' it would be simply that I do not pretend to understand anything I am not personally certain of. A good example is electronics (which I am somewhat familiar with). I understand that certain effects have certain causes, and we have theories that can predict those causes and effects, on electrons, so precise that we are able to build integrated circuits so small that the interaction between the electrons and individual atoms becomes the primary limitation of performance... But, perhaps ironically, I do not pretend to understand what an electron is, past what we are able to actually observe. And I speak about them minus the absolutism so freely expressed by others. If that means that I am mislead (aka: walking the garden path) then so be it.
To quote wiki:
But then, in order to accept the generally accepted definition of an electron, I would (by default) seem to be endorsing the entirety of the standard model of particle physics... Which itself, is more precisely based on other rarely spoken about assumptions... Quickly digressing into a pool of pseudo science under the banner of 'fact'.
So, I will gladly walk in my own garden, than be TOLD in which garden to walk. (edit: then!than)
And I will continue to question, everything.