Doc: "Lauds a post suggesting to never mention Anita.
Immediately brings her up in the very next post to say the same thing he's already said thousands of times."
Do you even logic? I agreed that all the exaggerated negative attention that Quinn and Sarkie were getting is what made them famous and allowed them to monetize the "controversy". Had they been ignored by people who take issue with them, they would have remained relative nobodies with a fraction of the attention and influence they now have.
I have no reason not to talk about Sarkeesian, because I don't think she's a problem. Plus, I'm not even talking about her, I'm talking about the unproductive reactions to her. I can certainly use her as a prime example of how "mocking and ridiculing" does NOT work to expose your opponent's flaws (it works FANTASTIC at exposing your own, though, as you have repeatedly demonstrated).
You're right, tho, I have said this a thousand times. It just feels really good to say it because I have yet to see one counter-argument presented. Not a single person has been able to show how the anti-Sarkeesies have been anything other than the key to making her a star. Better to just stick to making snarky remarks, right?
