The Tanoubliette: Pussy Hurt and Delusions or TTPHAD for short.

hodj_sl said:

You can always tell when Tanoomba has lost because he just runs to "I'm rubber you're glue!" arguments.

Click to expand...

I'm just showing you how very easily your own strategy can be used against you.

Also, I love how you don't even realize your entire oft-repeated "You're projecting!" argument is literally "I'm rubber, you're glue!"

You can't make this up.

hodj_sl said:

The focus on the failure to make her case in the University trial is because that trial is always entirely rigged in favor of the accusers, by definition. If you cannot win in that environment, you cannot win anywhere. Period. That's a significant tally mark in the "She's a liar" category, but not the whole justification for that conclusion.

Click to expand...

Not, it's not a significant mark in the "She's a liar" category. This is what you don't understand. Such a "mark" would include, by definition, evidence that contradicts her story, of which (again) we have yet to see a single shred of.

Soygen_sl said:

I'm well aware what you spergs are battling over. My statement is simply saying that engaging you in this topic at all is pointless since you're so retarded that you still believe this chick. Your personal feelings arewhyyou are an idiot.

Click to expand...

Oh, so you're making the ever-popular "Because my feels tell me you're wrong about this one thing, I've decided that nothing you ever say about anything will have any merit" point.

Thanks for showcasing your ignorance.

Soygen_sl said:

No, your personal belief that mattress girl is telling the truth after all the information that came out was available makes what you say about this topic have no merit. I'm sure you're quite knowledgeable in stuff you never discuss on this forum.

Click to expand...

I've seen all the information that came out. I didn't interpret it the same way you did. What possible way can you show me that your subjective interpretation has more merit than mine, other than saying "Everyone else here agrees with me!" (which I shouldn't need to explain is a valueless argument and a well-known logical fallacy).

Answer: You can't. Your interpretation is worth shit, just like my interpretation. This is why the only thing that matters is what can beOBJECTIVELYproven, which is (for better or for worse) NOTHING.

So you give up, Jhodi?

Oh, salty insults?

Then I guess you've got nothing else.

I accept your admission of defeat. Train harder, and next time you might do better.

Hey, look, according to Jhodi here ishard evidenceof creationism! It is copious, after all.

hodj_sl said:

Cumulative evidence is hard evidence.

Click to expand...

hodj_sl said:

Creatard thinks information found on AIG's website is valid, rather than a mix of pure conjecture with outright lies.

Click to expand...

And yet you think your personal, heavily biased interpretation of (at best) circumstantial evidence is not only valid, but conclusive.

Creatard logic at its finest.

hodj_sl said:

Again, your logical fallacy is faulty comparison.

Our evidence is sound.

Your evidence, and theirs, is made up.

Literally made up.

Click to expand...

Of course your evidence is sound. Your FEELS tell you so!