Fixed that for you.Also, the article was pretty terrible. "The kid had some jewelry thata school declined to identify as stolen because of federal privacy laws regarding students. Also, here's a summary of the rest of the shitstorm that we, the media, have helped to create. ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED?"
Oh, for fuck's sake. From the VERY FIRST PARAGRAPH OF THE BLAZE ARTICLE:Fixed that for you.
The police report identifies it as stolen, the school declined to comment on the case because of privacy laws.
Sexist? Dude, what the fuck are you talking about?Tanoomba, you are a sexist. If you can not see that from the posts in this thread you are retarded. Notice the adjectives you are using.
Almost everyone in our society is civil. You are describing a sociopath in your hypothetical situation, and ignoring the fact that, I don't know, it would be brought up in court if a person was known to go out and start altercations by verbal provocation first.
Just like Zimmerman was a guy who was just carrying around a gun while totally innocently following black people around his neighborhood.Yeah, he was just a guy, carrying around abunch of women's jewelry and a screwdriver in his backpack while at school. Totally normal.
It is totally innocent to follow people in a neighborhood that has experienced many break-ins before. Especially when you consider that his surveillance resulted in a conviction.Just like Zimmerman was a guy who was just carrying around a gun while totally innocently following black people around his neighborhood.
Maybe embedding will help.Fine, so most people won't set up a fight with someone just so they could kill them. Doesn't mean I can't point out a flaw in the system, a flaw which is as we speak, totally not hypothetically, going to allow a guy who by definition went looking for trouble to get away with killing a kid who had done nothing wrong. Does it disturb you that I have the audacity to be bothered by this? Fucking eat me.
Doesn't bother you when a person hires someone to kill another person though. You can totally see situations where that is justified.Sexist? Dude, what the fuck are you talking about?
If you think you have something clever to say, then say it instead of just trying to troll me into... what? I honestly don't know what you're trying to accomplish here.
Fine, so most people won't set up a fight with someone just so they could kill them. Doesn't mean I can't point out a flaw in the system, a flaw which is as we speak, totally not hypothetically, going to allow a guy who by definition went looking for trouble to get away with killing a kid who had done nothing wrong. Does it disturb you that I have the audacity to be bothered by this? Fucking eat me.
When screwdrivers are outlawed, only outlaws will have screwdrivers.It is totally innocent to follow people in a neighborhood that has experienced many break-ins before. Especially when you consider that his surveillance resulted in a conviction.
On the other hand, Im hardpressed to understand why a kid would take a screwdriver and abunch of women's jewelry to school with him, yet not be willing to say where he got it from.
this is the same faggot who cried about man's world and misogyny. this dude is literally wrapped in delusions of bullshit and everything he says or does is good and the rest of the world is bad there is no shame in this faggot. either this is a complete troll or this thing suffers from severe bipolar syndrome. it could also be autism, given his inability to feel guilt and shame.Doesn't bother you when a person hires someone to kill another person though. You can totally see situations where that is justified.
It is not a loophole, and there is no evidence Zimmerman did what you are saying anyway.
im telling you man, he is like that episode of south park when cartman started his own shopping channel to get old people to pay big money for junk jewelry he bought cheap from school. Its either that or he is the school pimp and that jewelry is for his hoes.Yeah, he was just a guy, carrying around abunch of women's jewelry and a screwdriver in his backpack while at school. Totally normal.
Says the guy who made up complete lies about 911 calls in order to try and paint Zimmerman as a racist.Do you really lack self-awareness to even that basic degree?
No one has assigned any good motives to him. You seem to consider "well, maybe he was attacked first" as canonizing the dude to sainthood. His motives in life are scatterbrained as fuck by anyone's account.So you guys don't even slightly get how you're assigning the worst possible motives to Martin's unexplained actions, and the best possible motives to Zimmerman's?
Do you really lack self-awareness to even that basic degree?
Says the guy who made up complete lies about 911 calls in order to try and paint Zimmerman as a racist.
Khalid and others have maintained throughout the entire thread that he was simply passively following Martin and did absolutely nothing to escalate the situation.No one has assigned any good motives to him. You seem to consider "well, maybe he was attacked first" as canonizing the dude to sainthood. His motives in life are scatterbrained as fuck by anyone's account.