Pretty sure that's the slogan in every state.It's law in NC as well.
Click it or Ticket!
We paid $50,000,000 for that slogan.
Depends on what type of accident you're in. Rolling down an embankment, you'd be far better off wearing a seatbelt than not in pretty much any vehicle, so you don't get tossed. But a front/rear impact maybe not so much, although it would prevent people from pinballing around and injuring each other.Seatbelts on a limo are of dubious value anyways since everyone is seated sideways. Your body doesn't bend so great that way.
Have you never followed a lawsuit before or something? Walmart's lawyers are doing what they're paid to do: trying to minimize the eventual damages. It's pretty rare that something like this is all or nothing. And it's doubtful that Morgan and Co. are only suing Walmart. There's probably multiple counterparties or whatever the term is. And everyone will point fingers at everyone else in order to minimize their damages. Would seat belts have made much of a difference in this situation? Probably not. But if bringing them up means that Walmart's damages are reduced by 10-20%, then the lawyers did their jobs.Xarpolis_sl said:Oh, none of that is important either?
Correct.I don't get why anyone is surprised by this. It's typical legal wrangling.
Who gives a fuck? You think this thread is going to be used in court or something? It's a fucking messageboard thread in a forum about TV, not a supreme court hearing.I understand that it's typical legal wrangling, but it changes the point of this thread. You're focusing on seat belts. I realize the court will do the same after lawyers are involved, but you guys are as well. That's what I was pointing out.
I'll be the judge of that.It's a fucking messageboard thread in a forum about TV, not a supreme court hearing.
The Judge Adam Show. On the everyday at 12.I'll RRP you for so long your grandkids won't be able to post here!