Vanessa's Tranny AMA Blog Thread

Punko said:

Everyone that interacts with Dave in this thread, ends up getting owned.

Click to expand...

Facts matter. Words matter. Disagree? Vanity isn't strictly a sin in the Bible, just as transsexualism isn't. The 7 deadly sins isn't in the Bible... that's literally a secular idea attributed to the Bible. Just as the saying, "God hates the sin, but loves the sinner". That is NOT scriptural. You'll find many things not scriptural that are attributed TO God, Jesus, and actual scripture. It's amazing. I'm here correcting you plebes and as usual y'all got owned and can't stand it.

I never said I'm not sinful. Everyone is. Everyone. Dipshit atheists with room temperature IQs just think because someone calls out sin, that they are wearing some badge saying: "I'm not sinful myself and therefore I'm entitled to call out others as Godless sinners". That's not how it really works.... at all. It's just John 1:5 at the forefront with you and your ilk.

Punko said:

While everyone agrees Dave is a complete lunatic

Click to expand...

YOU think this place is normal and a perfectly average swath of society, which is what makes you a lunatic of your own standards and you don't realize that. I'm self-aware enough to realize that Gender Dysphoria is not normal and a mental illness. You have no self-awareness at all, what a gimp you are.

Facebook is where the normies are. The problem with it is that due to that normalcy, free speech is very restricted because what is ALSO normal in society is blanket respect which anonymous people online (know anyone like that?) tend to disregard totally.

Punko said:

in his own mind, and only in his very own mind, Dave is a devout Christian.

Click to expand...

100% bullshit.

Punko said:

We'll disregard the sin of vanity

Click to expand...

You should, because you and others got destroyed on it above.

Punko said:

Christian that thinks blocking puberty and luring a woman and her child into its dwelling under a false pretense, are top Christian things to do.

Click to expand...

See? There you go... that bullshit. That's all you and others have: literal lies.

joz123 said:

I don't think God would approve of a male dressing like a chick and using a female name.

Click to expand...

Please quote scripture backing up your feefees. Thanks!!!

Erronius said:

I think according to the Marquis of Vanessaberry rules, your post doesn't meet the minimum requirements for owning anyone.

Click to expand...

Well look... Punko is the guy that shared pictures of his shirts to this forum. Why? I dunno... I think I was awol then but still; it's still a demonstrable action of a person who defines life and success as materialistic.

Because, to an atheist, what else is there, really? I'm being totally serious... I can't imagine a more nihilistic existence than being an atheist.

Erronius said:

You need at LEAST another 3-4 individual quotes with an additional 1K words that no one is even going to bother reading, to even qualify.

Click to expand...

Yet you guys DO read it. It's exquisite.

Erronius said:

Then season with enough 'cringe' for your tastes, and serve.

Click to expand...

I really can't argue this point. I'm probably extremely cringy to people like you, yeah. I can see it.

Do you think you're not cringy to the rest of the world? I'm not saying yes or no one way or another. That's for you to contemplate. It's just food for thought

It's really bizarre why LLR has decided to allow the use of uploaded videos here, but not the video thread~

Wow... tear-inducing.

Sevens said:

Oooo you are going to get so owned by Vanessa, you best just delete your account now cause he's going to burn you so bad you wont ever want to show your face here again!!1!

Click to expand...

No, because unlike you... Hydromarty doesn't come off as a Godless atheist just looking to be a hateful trans-hating shitstain like you.

I've told you before.... people get from me what they give to me. I'm just a mirror.

Right, chunks?

Hydromarty said:

Deuteronomy 22:5 The woman shall not wear that which pertaineth unto a man, neither shall a man put on a woman's garment: for all that do so are abomination unto the LORD thy God.

Click to expand...

This is good, and is the most challenging scripture.... actual scripture, that seems to condemn transsexualism.

For what it's worth, this is also KJV. So for all the trolls, take note: this is just straight up good faith answering of a question put forth by a good faith person.

So concerning Deuteronomy 22:5, we have this long winded explanation. Read it carefully, concisely, as I have.









This is a straight up intellectual, etymological, and dissection of the passage... which, ironically, is more focused on "women wearing trousers" than transsexualism.

If the entirety of the Bible is a testament of how to live life properly and follow the Lord God, His Son, and his tenets, why is 31,000 verses about these things where one... ONE thing about the dress of males and females of such important to people about me?

Here's a challenge over this scripture: I just wear a sackcloth for the rest of my life as repentance of wearing, say, a dress when I went to dinner in 2019 on a date. This is literally curbing the one rule, yes?

Homosexuals just need to not actually commit sodomy for them to not "sin". Because I don't (and I don't think anyone logical) believes a gay man's mere existence is an affront to God... i.e. the very act of being born as a gay man is not a pre-ordained ticket to detachment FROM God in and of itself. It is the action of sodomy that is reprehensible to God.

Where does the transsexual who has 0 choice in their creation process of this mental illness of Gender Dysphoria stand on that as well?

If you feel people are born to just suffer... literally pre-ordained to detachment from God, then that in and of itself is non-Christian.

Let he who is athirst, come. Everyone has a choice. ...a choice to reject God or come to Him. People like Sevens have rejected Christ and why he is going to burn in hell for eternity. Many are. Their choice. Literally their choice. I choose Christ. They choose otherwise.

But there's an obsession about my relationship to Christ over my transsexuality, which I didn't choose to have. It's interesting, isn't it?

Thou shalt not wear make up.
Thou shalt not get bolt ons.
Thou shalt not do something about the mental illness inside you.
Thou shalt not try to better your life into happiness instead of misery.

^ These are not scriptural.... obviously.

I welcome this dialogue. I don't run and hide like some. I'm here, head on into it.