I worked on VG at Sigil. What finally caused SOE to sunset it was simply low population. If a game isn't making money, there's no reason to keep it. SOE is not a charity. We're a business. It makes ZERO sense to intentionally operate a game at a loss.
Ok I am well aware that if a game isn't making any money, the company running the game will cancel it. My question was why did SOE negelct and fail to advertise VG so much that it ended up running at a loss causing SOE to cut it? I mean in 2009, SOE stuck VG in maintence mode for like almost 2 years with no updates, etc. You really think paying customers are going to stick around for a game that is stagnant? Just seems to me SOE didnt really want to be bothered with VG from the begining.
I understand you probably can't answer this question entirely as you are not one of the guys that makes the decisions on where SOE puts it's resources. It just boggles my mind any company would purchase a half made project, then piss it into the ground. Don't get me wrong, had SOE not even done that, VG would have never been. But I can't help but feel if SOE put a little more into it, they wouldnt be sunsetting the game in 6 days. But perhaps the game was way too broken code wise that it would have cost SOE way too much to fix it, IDK, i just was really curious about the general feeling SOE has toward VG over the years from the time they bought it until now.
Edit: I also wonder if VG would have made enough money to stay alive had it remained a Sub based game only and never went F2P.
Not to keep beating a dead horse here but again it seems to me that it was more than just money that made SOE sunset it instead of putting it back in maintenence mode and lowering the sub. I mean I find it hard to believe VG made more money in the 2 years it was in maintenence mode than it does now. If it did then its because it was a sub game and SOE had no problem charging people to play a game that was getting no updates.
Several players even asked SOE to just put it back in maintainence mode but were refused becuase "thats not good customer service." LOL SOE had no problem doing that before. Oh well I guess its all moot. Whats done it done, will just have to wait til the EMU goes live at this point.