Mahes
Bronze Baronet of the Realm
- 5,483
- 6,594
No surprise here. I wonder just how many will get fired.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/...b0fde8b0d157a9
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/...b0fde8b0d157a9
No, I don't think they will. Dealers have to please their customers or we will go somewhere else for our next car. Even if someone passes a law saying they must, they will tell the customer first giving us a chance to leave.You know no matter what they'll do a new software update to your car if you take it to a dealer.
I guess I'm old fashioned. I never saw the appeal to a diesel car. Of course I remember when GM tried it in the 80's and it was a gigantic disaster. I have a diesel truck made before they changed the rules on diesels and introduced ultra low sulfur diesel. It gets 19mpg highway, 17 while towing a pretty good size trailer and tow 10,000 pounds max. Torque, I just don't see the interest for that in a car.
"I guess their execs did......Nazi this coming??"No surprise here. I wonder just how many will get fired.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/...b0fde8b0d157a9
Horsepower vs. TorqueI guess I'm old fashioned. I never saw the appeal to a diesel car. Of course I remember when GM tried it in the 80's and it was a gigantic disaster. I have a diesel truck made before they changed the rules on diesels and introduced ultra low sulfur diesel. It gets 19mpg highway, 17 while towing a pretty good size trailer and tow 10,000 pounds max. Torque, I just don't see the interest for that in a car.
?You know, a lot of people buy horsepower, when what they really want is torque,? Hubbard told me. ?Torque is what gets you to the speed you want quickly; horsepower is what keeps you there.?
The concept of horsepower as a measurement of work was identified in the 1800s by steam engine pioneer James Watt, who ponied up the term based on his observation of horses working in a mill. It?s an arcane concept that has stuck with us to this day.
Torque, on the other hand, is the twisting, rotational force generated by an engine; this force is transferred through the drive system into the wheels. Torque is what pushes you back in the seat when you step on the accelerator.
The issue is that in some states you won't be allowed to register that vehicle and legally drive it if it isn't passing the emission standards. People will be forced to do that software update in those states.No, I don't think they will. Dealers have to please their customers or we will go somewhere else for our next car. Even if someone passes a law saying they must, they will tell the customer first giving us a chance to leave.
The appeal is 40+ MPG and fuel prices that, while it's currently more expensive, stays a lot more stable.
So, because the rules are strict, its the rulemakers fault that companies try to rig the results?Really this is California's fault. If the CARB stuff was not so insane it would be much less of a problem to have diesel here. Emissions testing is a huge scam in California. I used to watch shops intentionally cause people to fail so they could slap a 100-200 dollar repair fee on them then send them on their way. It really is the worst.
Go suck an exhaust pipe.Really this is California's fault. If the CARB stuff was not so insane it would be much less of a problem to have diesel here. Emissions testing is a huge scam in California. I used to watch shops intentionally cause people to fail so they could slap a 100-200 dollar repair fee on them then send them on their way. It really is the worst.
Yes. Set emissions standards at the factory and stop ass fucking people every year. Crazy right.So, because the rules are strict, its the rulemakers fault that companies try to rig the results?
And because there are unscrupulous emissions testing facilities, we should just do away with emissions testing?
Wow. Interesting points sir.
Crazy in the sense that it wouldn't work, yes.Yes. Set emissions standards at the factory and stop ass fucking people every year. Crazy right.
Try not to get beheaded today Shitzena.
Except it does as emissions testing is not everywhere. I didn't see Washington state, California, or Texas fail because of lack of emissions testing. None of those states have testing everywhere. The federal regulation has done more to curb carbon emissions than smog testing ever has.Crazy in the sense that it wouldn't work, yes.
Texas has emissions testing in all the densely populated counties. I don't know about the other states but just going HURR DURR testing not needed! derp isn't any kind of answer to VW systematically lying to the EPA regarding their emissions.Except it does as emissions testing is not everywhere. I didn't see Washington state, California, or Texas fail because of lack of emissions testing. None of those states have testing everywhere. The federal regulation has done more to curb carbon emissions than smog testing ever has.
Oh ok, so in the "VW gets busted" thread, you say "it's california's fault", but you didn't say to excuse VW. Ok.I never said to excuse VW.
True but if you "set emissions at the factory" and never test again, whats to stop large scale modification once the restrictions become too onerous? The emissions in fact are set at the factory, AND the cars are tested. They go hand in hand it's not either/or.Smog testing facilities did not catch VW a lab did.
What about when an end-user is able to modify the vehicle so it no long is within the guidelines you want set/enforced at the factories?You can have periodic testing by labs/inspectors to ensure manufacturers are not cheating like in every single other industry in the world. You do not need to saddle the end user with it.