Read the first 4 books. Burn the rest and forget this shit ever existed.I was given the Sword of Truth series recently, and just finished book 2. For the first 70% of book 1, I honestly couldn't figure out what all the fuss was about with this series (really, for a lot of book 1, if you set aside some of the more unpleasant imagery, the language used makes it read like it was written for an audience that's maybe 13 years old), but most of the way through the first book something clicked, and I found myself really enjoying it.
I vaguely recall hearing somewhere that the series starts to get weird later on down the line, but I'm sufficiently hooked at this point to see it through to the end.
It devolves into thinly veiled political rants.Read the first 4 books. Burn the rest and forget this shit ever existed.
Gardens of the Moon is my favorite of all the books in the series and I have read it like 6 times.Don't read it out of order. People who suggest that are evil commies that should be sworded with truth.
Read it right. Some people complain about the first book being hard to follow, they are dumbheads. Read it in the right order, don't skip anything. It's an awesome series start to finish(except for large chunks of Toll the Hounds, but even that pays off at the end like every book in the series).
I went in to the series blind, and there's 7,000 posts here that can attest to how dimwitted and slow to pick up on details I am. I had no trouble with book one, and if anything the later books get way more dense with all the characters you have to keep track of all over the world.
I just read the entire trilogy last week and enjoyed it well enough. It gets better in the next two books but I can understand why you didn't like it. Did you read the Narnia books at all, I saw you reference them but just checking? If you didn't it is 100% a worthless trilogy and wouldn't recommend it to others that haven't read at least a couple of those books.I just finished reading The Magicians by Lev Grossman and.... it was quite horrible. It's a story about a child who barley manages to progress to a man child and his moronic "friends" who go to a magical academy where they learn magic, presumably, when they aren't being angsty, drinking, or screwing one another. Seldom have I read an author who went so far out of his way to ensure that none of his characters were likeable, sympathetic , or redeemable in anyway whatsoever and to create a magic system so dull and lacking in wonder. The MC learns for the sake of competing with those around him alone; he takes no joy in anything he does (for no discernible reason other than him being a giant douchebag), while whining about it constantly, and makes no effort to explore his abilities or even develop an interest in anything at all at any point in the novel. As for the plot, there isn't one, things just randomly happen while the MC and his band of idiotic hedonists do as they wish throughout the book until they go on an adventure to the worst ripoff of Narnia I have ever encountered where in they continue to act like idiots while managing to still be miserable, petulant and general wastes of space. By the end I was hoping that the MC would at least have the decency to hang himself (the way he was written it should have been a temptation a least) but unsurprisingly I was denied even that slim chance of ending things on a high note.
Avoid if you value your time.
Yes I did and I agree, at least, that it's a children's series that has its own pros and cons. Still, however derivative the genre is Grossman is rather blatant in his representation of Fillory (what little we see of it) in the first book, which I'm sure he did on purpose for whatever reason. I just found it odd and lazy on his part (on top of everything else that I mentioned) but perhaps there is more to distinguish the two worlds from each other as the series progresses.I just read the entire trilogy last week and enjoyed it well enough. It gets better in the next two books but I can understand why you didn't like it. Did you read the Narnia books at all, I saw you reference them but just checking? If you didn't it is 100% a worthless trilogy and wouldn't recommend it to others that haven't read at least a couple of those books.
One thing I don't like about his writing is the way he approaches time. One moment he is spending two chapters on a single day, the next moment he is fast forwarding through a year with a barely passable synopsis.
Yeah, agreed.I enjoyed the ending of Magician's Land, but I'm glad it's over.