It's worth it imo, Perkins is a solid character
It's a lot of familiar people in voice crew, and relatively short. Skippy makes comments about it a few times in later books, but I don't recall much about it. Gut says it's probably skipable, but it's not a bad listen. Reviews on audible for it are all over the place lol
It's a lot of familiar people in voice crew, and relatively short. Skippy makes comments about it a few times in later books, but I don't recall much about it. Gut says it's probably skipable, but it's not a bad listen.
IMO he gets a little off the rails and there are a few books in the middle of the series that are more on the mediocre side. They do get better again later thoughI'm 2/3rds of the way through book seven (Renegades) and it's the first one I'd move to the "don't like" category. The mission is too impossible and it takes a lot of pages to get to them actually starting to tackle it. I just find the whole story really dull compared to book six.
The Mistborn books are some of the best shit in the genre.I have been remiss in reading these last several months, but I landed on this during my Covid stint and it is getting surprisingly good:
View attachment 412969
Also, my fav author is releasing a book on the 24th and I am pumped - Edit - it was posted above and my friend lied to me about the release date so I just bought it.
View attachment 412970
LOTR is quiet different from D&D and EQ imo. There is much more magic in the latter. If you want fantasy shit, my favorite has to be Malazan books, The Black Company, Robin Hobb's books (skip the The Rain Wild Chronicles imo), all of Raymond Feist's Midkemia books (though the last trilogy was kind of shit) and the Mistborn books. There is much more but this is a start. I enjoy new massive worlds so I like long book series. If you want one off books, I highly suggest Neil Gaiman; start with Neverwhere and The Ocean at the End of the Lane.Looking for rec's on some good fantasy stuff to read? LOTR/D&D/EQ-esque. Read a bunch of Forgotten Realms and Dragonlance stuff as a teen. Been in the mood to read some again. Audiobook would be nice but not required.
Thanks for the suggestions! Ya LOTR is very different, just giving examples of what I like. Gaiman I am a huge fan of. Slowly working my way through his stuff.LOTR is quiet different from D&D and EQ imo. There is much more magic in the latter. If you want fantasy shit, my favorite has to be Malazan books, The Black Company, Robin Hobb's books (skip the The Rain Wild Chronicles imo), all of Raymond Feist's Midkemia books (though the last trilogy was kind of shit) and the Mistborn books. There is much more but this is a start. I enjoy new massive worlds so I like long book series. If you want one off books, I highly suggest Neil Gaiman; start with Neverwhere and The Ocean at the End of the Lane.
I always agree with a malazan recommendation, also try mark Lawrence either his prince of thorns trilogy or the red queens war trilogy.Looking for rec's on some good fantasy stuff to read? LOTR/D&D/EQ-esque. Read a bunch of Forgotten Realms and Dragonlance stuff as a teen. Been in the mood to read some again. Audiobook would be nice but not required.
I did all of them audio last year, the narrator swap was a bit jarring at first especially since words and voices you got used to changed But both are good, not steven pacey good but still good. If you like audio books or have a commute I would recommend them.Anyone do the audiobooks for the Malazan stuff? I listened to a sample and it was kind of eh
Good book. Changed the way I look at history and I now believe that we (in modern American society) do history all wrong. That is coming from someone with a degree in history. When a modern person is trying to find meaning in the world or a mode of being, they look back at history. To a modern person history is a timeline of figures and events, each with their own special significance. A modern person tallies up those events and figures and gives themself an idea of how they should act in the world and what the world means to them. But this means the person has little room to maneuver. They are constrained by history, at the forefront of which they stand. An archaic person has no such problem as they did not recognize history as we do. History to an archaic person was a set of categories (war, harvest, death) and a cast of heroes (fire bringer, dragon slayer). To explain the world and how they should move within it the archaic person place the event before them into a mythical category and them embodied the hero, doing as they did, and this was the model that taught them how to deal with the world. The archaic person was not constrained by history, with its two thousand years worth of weight. They were guided by mythology. Example; there is a war and a group of young men are sent off to fight. A modern man would see that history is a sequence of wars in which the common soldier gets chewed up and killed while the generals get all the glory. He becomes depressed and hopeless and his world becomes a dark place. An archaic man who goes off to fight in this war has a category for it; this is the same as the conflict between good and evil (the gods and the devils) that he can now participate in. He has his model of the hero and therefore knows how to act. Even if he dies, death is simply the next step and he will be welcomed into the host of heroes anyway. I read this near abouts when I read Julius Evola’s “Metaphysics of War” and I think they go along well together. I would also suggest one read “All Quiet on the Western Front” by Erich Marie Remarque and “Storm of Steel” by Ernst Junger immediately after. I feel these two books about the First World War offer an amazing example of how modern and archaic man react to the same situation. |