Edward Jones benefits are abysmal, like bottom of the pack awful. Not sure where you heard they had good benefits. My wife was a manager there and she was on my benefits. They don't even have maternity leave, it is short term disability. High deductible medical, almost no 401k match, etc.Currently in the job hunt, but still employed for a financial services company. What I've found is the benefits for Banks, and other financial companies are crazy good. My job keeps referring to being a "premier" employer. Having looked at benefits at other companies like Edward Jo
nes, Wells Fargo, Raymond James, etc, it all seems to be pretty damn good. Wall St. gives them bene's!
I did the PMI-ACP, which is for Agile certified practitioner and more software development related. It is newly added within the last two years. The test was somewhat of a joke and you could pass just from getting a couple books online. The PMP is supposed to be much harder, however I somewhat doubt it, and I had qualified for that as well but haven't taken it yet. I do see a lot of people in the field with it listed though.Anyone want to school me on PMI certification. I have been a "project manager" for a number of years but in my new job that title is now a subset of my official job. I'm curious if anyone has it and do you think it was worth it?
It's not a requirement for my job and in fact none of project managers have it and I will be their boss. Just thinking down the road.
[email protected]/* <![CDATA[ */!function(t,e,r,n,c,a,p){try{t=document.currentScript||function(){for(t=document.getElementsByTagName('script'),e=t.length;e--if(t[e].getAttribute('data-cfhash'))return t[e]}();if(t&&(c=t.previousSibling)){p=t.parentNode;if(a=c.getAttribute('data-cfemail')){for(e='',r='0x'+a.substr(0,2)|0,n=2;a.length-n;n+=2)e+='%'+('0'+('0x'+a.substr(n,2)^r).toString(16)).slice(-2);p.replaceChild(document.createTextNode(decodeURIComponent(e)),c)}p.removeChild(t)}}catch(u){}}()/* ]]> */Also known as what large companies try to implement without understanding it doesn't scale to big teams.I did the PMI-ACP, which is for Agile certified practitioner and more software development related. It is newly added within the last two years. The test was somewhat of a joke and you could pass just from getting a couple books online. The PMP is supposed to be much harder, however I somewhat doubt it, and I had qualified for that as well but haven't taken it yet. I do see a lot of people in the field with it listed though.
If Agile doesn't work at VMware it sure the hell won't work at EMC. I just love how our company (EMC owns 80% of VMware) is like AGILE IS THE SOLUTION TO ALL DEVELOPMENTS PROBLEMS LOLOLOLOLOL.I just took some Agile training.. it was the stupidest shit I've ever heard and I feel like we already implement some aspects of it on a personal level anyways.
Just something to get management fired up about.
Ahh, Engineers are involved in this shit in our org. I more or less Rally against it alongside some of our senior leadership.I just program things and let the bosses deal with that stuff, that stuff ensures I'll never want to be management.
It's basically a marketing term now. Something to sell management and companies on. It's not meant for double digit teams and if used as such no bueno.[email protected]/* <![CDATA[ */!function(t,e,r,n,c,a,p){try{t=document.currentScript||function(){for(t=document.getElementsByTagName('script'),e=t.length;e--if(t[e].getAttribute('data-cfhash'))return t[e]}();if(t&&(c=t.previousSibling)){p=t.parentNode;if(a=c.getAttribute('data-cfemail')){for(e='',r='0x'+a.substr(0,2)|0,n=2;a.length-n;n+=2)e+='%'+('0'+('0x'+a.substr(n,2)^r).toString(16)).slice(-2);p.replaceChild(document.createTextNode(decodeURIComponent(e)),c)}p.removeChild(t)}}catch(u){}}()/* ]]> */Also known as what large companies try to implement without understanding it doesn't scale to big teams.
PMP more or less means you are an obnoxious process driven person who shouldn't be hired.
Vinen: "Agile just means permanent crunch time"
Yep, people fail to realize that Waterfall and Spiral methodologies exist for a reason. They aren't evil.It's basically a marketing term now. Something to sell management and companies on. It's not meant for double digit teams and if used as such no bueno.
More or less.I've seen the most success with spiral for larger teams personally. For agile to really work at larger levels you need good team division. i.e. divide a 300person company into groups of 10 people, who are all working on essentially independent components/modules/whatever and treating the other teams implementing them like customers.
You can break down 50 people in 8 scrum teams or so. This will enable you to have right sized teams.Agile project management, at least as I understand it, is, by definition, not intended for large teams. For example, you can't do a daily stand up with 50 people. That would defeat the purpose. What you can do in come cases, however, is break the team down into subteams and manage them with scrum or whatever.
Agile vs. Waterfall, each have their own strengths and the real point is to not try to be dogmatic on either one. For example, the pure Agile notion of putting off detailed requirements and embracing change at any point in the lifecycle absolutely would not fly on a NASA program, as well it shouldn't.
Some ideas, like pairing, may or may not fly depending on the individuals. Other concepts, such as test-driven development (I think) are a good idea no matter what paradigm you're using.