You're asking me to prove that something didn't happen? There's a lot of things left unstated in this case right now, you're the one filling in the blanks however you want, not me.Sorry, where is it stated that she never rejected his advances off camera? I must have missed that information. Please point me to it if you could.
So every woman who has sex while drunk should be charged with rape?I would argue that if both parties are drunk, neither is capable of giving, nor receiving consent. Many drunken one night stands will pass by without incident, despite the fact that it was 'mutual rape'. The problem arises when one party has an issue with this situation.
Lower your weapons dude. You seemed to imply that you had information that I did not. I just wanted it too.You're asking me to prove that something didn't happen? There's a lot of things left unstated in this case right now, you're the one filling in the blanks however you want, not me.
People do not 'get charged' with rape, or any other crime, by some nebulous legal being. They get charged by their victim. If nobody has been victimized, then there is no charge. Get it?So every woman who has sex while drunk should be charged with rape?
this is the most asinine thing I read today.People do not 'get charged' with rape,or any other crime, by some nebulous legal being.They get charged by their [alleged] victim.If nobody has been victimized, then there is no charge. Get it?
There is no victim if there is no criminal under legal context. There is alleged victim. Alleged victim charges alleged criminal. In this sense, there is no victim, nor there is criminal, under the eyes of the law, until proven otherwise.How so?
Ok, let me rephrase since you're dodging the point. You're literally saying its impossible for two people to have sex while they are both drunk without it being two instances of rape? You just did say it actually, I quoted you. Answer yes or no, or admit its a stupid thing to say, no backpedaling rationalizations. Fuck man, even Tanoomba isn't going that far.People do not 'get charged' with rape, or any other crime, by some nebulous legal being. They get charged by their victim. If nobody has been victimized, then there is no charge. Get it?
That is exactly what I'm saying. Just because one, or both parties, are fine with having unconsented sex, does not mean it did not happen, and does not mean there was no wrongdoing.Ok, let me rephrase since you're dodging the point. You're literally saying its impossible for two people to have sex while they are both drunk without it being two instances of rape? You just did say it actually, I quoted you. Answer yes or no, or admit its a stupid thing to say, no backpedaling rationalizations. Fuck man, even Tanoomba isn't going that far.
So now that you've removed personal responsibility while intoxicated from any decisions regarding sex how does this reasoning fit in with regards to DUI?That is exactly what I'm saying. Just because one, or both parties, are fine with having unconsented sex, does not mean it did not happen, and does not mean there was no wrongdoing.
'mutual rape'
I know understand why people trend conservative as they get older. That shit is so crazy it makes me want to vote Republican.Just because one, or both parties, arefine with having unconsented sex, does not mean it did not happen, and does not mean there was no wrongdoing.
Bro, tell me bout it.I know understand why people trend conservative as they get older. That shit is so crazy it makes me want to vote Republican.
Meh, people are making it out to be a lot crazier a concept than it actually is. Sex without consent carries with it a danger of being construed as rape. Consent cannot be given in certain situations - either while intoxicated, or under duress, or if the party is too young etc. It can't be received while intoxicated either.I know understand why people trend conservative as they get older. That shit is so crazy it makes me want to vote Republican.
No victims no mens rea but hey, double rape mutual wrongdoing for everyone.
How do you know you are fine with it if you are impaired?If you're fine with having it, doesn't that actually make it consensual?
So now that you've removed personal responsibility while intoxicated from any decisions regarding sex how does this reasoning fit in with regards to DUI?Consent cannot be given in certain situations - either while intoxicated,