why isn't this misogynist faggot in jail yet? #OUTRAGEThe best in my opinion.
The persons own dorm room might fairly be considered their home, although if they share it with a roommate then they have even less of an expectation of privacy... but the whole campus? Thats pretty ridiculous...On the other hand I think I saw a video of Chomsky defending ultra PC language policing on college campuses because a campus is the students' "home" and no one should ever have to feel offended (or I guess more fairly to his point, discriminated against) in their home.
Not sure what anti feminist point that fifth video is supposed to make but all I took from it is that the guy was an absolute total dickhead, and not in the good, thoughtful, entertaining way like Hitchens or Maher.
no, just "complaint." police got involved later on. will probably charge if she has sufficient evidence to press for one, but probably won't. College, on the other hand, can expel him.So what's the scoop with this? Charges get dismissed yet or what? Were charges ever even filed?
I think it may be interpreted as sexist since Hitchens believes that female sex is the gentle sex (not true. females are equally, if not more, violent domestically and their method of violence is different from men).She acts like she got him so good too. REMEMBER THAT?????
And that Christopher Hitchens video is pretty frustrating. All he said was they don't HAVE to work. Nobody has to do anything they don't want, how the fuck is that sexist.
yes definitely.Are there any attractive Feminists?
Are you talking about retroactive rape? So this chick obviously is willing and enjoying the public munching, but if she decides in the last 5 seconds that it is a huge mistake and unwanted, the whole thing was "rape"?Oh he went to jail alright - Federal assrape jail too. Dude was a goaltender and tiny. Like 5'8. I bet he's having fun getting his shit pushed in forcefully. Fitting.
I totally disagree that Social/emotional coercion (especially while under the influences of drugs/alcohol) for the purposes of sexual intercourse is not rape, and to be perfectly honest, I'm not interested in convincing you otherwise. To me, that would be like taking time out of my day to convince someone that the sky is blue.
The existence of this video where she is enjoying herself is totally irrelevant. What if there was a similar video of my friend? She was DTF at an earlier point in the evening, but subsequent events changed that.
As soon as willingness is out of the picture, it's rape. Really not much argument about it.
The girl Laurie Penny, attacked Starkey first if you pay attention to the video. She's a super radical feminist in Europe, he's a homosexual Monarchist with a heavy drinking problem. She tried to call him a racist and some other things, he fucking demolished her shit by exposing her hypocritical nature. Watch the video again and listen to what Starkey says about how in England you give your time freely when you're a public figure to things like debates, and she was demanding a massive sum of money to show up when he was offering to do it for free. Basically she was being a money grubbing skank who tried to personally attack Starkey, he pushed her shit in, she cried about it.On the other hand I think I saw a video of Chomsky defending ultra PC language policing on college campuses because a campus is the students' "home" and no one should ever have to feel offended (or I guess more fairly to his point, discriminated against) in their home.
Not sure what anti feminist point that fifth video is supposed to make but all I took from it is that the guy was an absolute total dickhead, and not in the good, thoughtful, entertaining way like Hitchens or Maher.
He probably could have said it more gently. Either he means, "Personally I feel a responsibility to earn money for my family and wouldn't want my wife to be in a position where she needs to go out and work.". Or he means, "The men go out and work and the women should stay home. If the woman absolutely needs to go and have a 'career' they can go I guess."She acts like she got him so good too. REMEMBER THAT?????
And that Christopher Hitchens video is pretty frustrating. All he said was they don't HAVE to work. Nobody has to do anything they don't want, how the fuck is that sexist.
I didn't say she was "in the right" per se, she seemed cunty enough herself. But that dude was way over the top, even given your explanation, which I did glean a bit from context and I noticed everything you mentioned. I just consider completely losing your temper in a public forum like that to be a losing move even if you occupy the winning position. He came across as incredibly rustled and just a run of the mill asshole to me. I don't particularly like the whole pedestalization of being "English" and all that tradition horseshit either. Dude seemed pompous and pretentious even if she is a little weasel.The girl Laurie Penny, attacked Starkey first if you pay attention to the video. She's a super radical feminist in Europe, he's a homosexual Monarchist with a heavy drinking problem. She tried to call him a racist and some other things, he fucking demolished her shit by exposing her hypocritical nature. Watch the video again and listen to what Starkey says about how in England you give your time freely when you're a public figure to things like debates, and she was demanding a massive sum of money to show up when he was offering to do it for free. Basically she was being a money grubbing skank who tried to personally attack Starkey, he pushed her shit in, she cried about it.
You are literally the only person I've ever heard of watching that video and thinking she was in the right. Even during the video, the AUDIENCE is screaming at her that her self righteous indignation isn't justified because she started slandering Starkey first.